In a 1996 interview, Kalle Lasn explained the foundation’s goal: What we’re trying to do is pioneer a new form of social activism using all the power of the mass media to
sell ideas, rather than products.
“ Adbusters’ website said that from their “one simple demand—a presidential commission to separate money from politics” they would “start setting the agenda for a new
“ Since Adbusters concludes that advertising conditions people to look to external sources, to define their own personal identities, the magazine advocates a “natural
and authentic self apart from the consumer society”.
Adbusters believe large corporations control mainstream media and the flow of information, and culture jamming aims to challenge this as a form of protest.
 Others declare the movement an easy way for upper- and middle-class citizens to feel empowered by engaging in activism that bears no personal cost, such as the campaign
“Buy Nothing Day”.
An environmental message that challenged the large forestry companies was considered ‘advocacy advertising’ and was disallowed, even though the ‘informational’ messages that
glorified clearcutting were OK.” The foundation was born out of their belief that citizens do not have the same access to the information flows as corporations.
 Reception Heath and Potter’s The Rebel Sell, which is critical of Adbusters, claimed that the blackspot shoe’s existence proves that “no rational person could possibly
believe that there is any tension between ‘mainstream’ and ‘alternative’ culture.
 According to a former Adbusters employee, “The CBC’s reaction to the proposed television commercial created the real flash point for the Media Foundation.
Adbusters has launched numerous international campaigns, including Buy Nothing Day, TV Turnoff Week and Occupy Wall Street, and is known for their “subvertisements” that
spoof popular advertisements.
“ The foundation is particularly well known for its culture jamming campaigns, and the magazine often features photographs of politically motivated billboard or advertisement
vandalism sent in by readers.
Martin noted that Blackspot was effectively telling consumers, “We know we are marketing to you, and you are as good as we are at this, and your opinion matters,” while Weaver
stated that “This is not a call to sales of the shoe so much as it is a call to participate in the community of Adbusters by buying the shoe.
 Issues Anti-advertising Adbusters describes itself as anti-advertising: it blames advertising for playing a central role in creating and maintaining consumer culture.
 In one case, a CHUM representative is quoted as saying the ads “were so blatantly against television and that is our entire core business.
Most broadcasters refused the commercials, fearing the ads would upset other advertisers as well as violate business principles by “contaminating the purity of media environments
designed exclusively for communicating commercial messages”.
 Kalle Lasn declared the ruling a success and said, “After twenty years of legal struggle, the courts have finally given us permission to take on the media
corporations and hold them up to public scrutiny.
“ Commercial style The foundation has been criticized for having a style and form that are too similar to the media and commercial product that Adbusters attack,
that its high gloss design makes the magazine too expensive, and that a style over substance approach is used to mask sub-par content.
This argument is based on the premise that the advertising industry goes to great effort and expense to associate desire and identity with commodities.
In the September/October 2001 “Graphic Anarchy” issue, Adbusters were culture jammed themselves in a manner of speaking: they hailed the work of Swiss graphic designer Ernst
Bettler as “one of the greatest design interventions on record”, unaware that Bettler’s story was an elaborate hoax.
The ruling represents a victory for Adbusters, but it is the first step of their intended goal, essentially opening the door for future legal action against the media conglomerates.
The foundation notes that concern over the flow of information goes beyond the desire to protect democratic transparency, freedom of speech or the public’s access to the airwaves.
After spending many years railing against the practices of megacorporations like McDonalds, Starbucks and Nike, we wanted to prove that running an ethical, environmentally
responsible business is possible … and that taking market share away from megacorporations is better than whining about them.
One Flag The “One Flag” competition encouraged readers to create a flag that symbolized “global citizenship”, without using language or commonly known symbols.
 The sale of more than twenty-five thousand pairs through an alternative distribution network is an example of Western consumer activism marketing.
The term “jam” contains more than one meaning, including improvising, by re-situating an image or idea already in existence, and interrupting, by attempting to stop the workings
of a machine.
 The Blackspot Shoes campaign has stirred heated debate, as Adbusters admits to using the same marketing technique which it denounces other companies for using by originally
purchasing much advertising space for the shoe.
One of the foundation’s key campaigns continues to be the Media Carta, a “movement to enshrine The Right to Communicate in the constitutions of all free nations, and in
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.”
Although it supports these causes, the foundation instead situates the battle of the mind at the center of its political agenda.
 Activism also takes many other forms such as corporate boycotts and ‘art as protest’, often incorporating humor.
 Adbusters’ senior editor Micah White said they had suggested the protest via their email list and it “was spontaneously taken up by all the people of the world.
The campaigns attempt to remove people from the “isolated reality of consumer comforts”.
The goal is to “make the public airwaves truly public, and not just a corporate domain.
Under Section 3 of the Broadcasting Act, television is a public space allowing ordinary citizens to possess the same rights as advertising agencies and corporations to purchase
30 seconds of airtime from major broadcasters.
“ Occupy Wall Street Main article: Occupy Wall Street In mid-2011, Adbusters Foundation proposed a peaceful occupation of Wall Street to protest corporate influence
on democracy, a growing disparity in wealth, and the absence of legal repercussions behind the recent global financial crisis.
Since the early 1980s, Lasn had been making films that explored the spiritual and cultural lessons the West could learn from the Japanese experience with capitalism.
 Adbusters’s stated goals include combating the negative effects of advertising and empowering its readers to regain control of culture, encouraging them to ask “Are we
consumers and citizens?
 In the “culture jamming” context, détournement means taking symbols, logos and slogans that are considered to be the vehicles upon which the “dominant discourse” of “late
capitalism” is communicated and changing them – frequently in significant but minor ways – to subvert the “monologue of the ruling order” [Debord].
Fighting to counter pro-consumerist advertising is done not as a means to an end, but as the end in itself.
Lasn and Shmalz, outraged by the use of the public airwaves to deliver what they felt was deceptive anti-environmentalist propaganda, responded by producing the “Talking Rainforest”
anti-ad in which an old-growth tree explains to a sapling that “a tree farm is not a forest.”
[‘1. “About” Archived 31 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine. Adbusters Media Foundation. Retrieved 3 October 2011.
2. ^ “About Adbusters Archived 31 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine.” Adbusters Media Foundation. Retrieved 19 December 2010.
Eric Pfanner. Fighting guerrilla graffiti, The New York Times, 15 March 2004
4. ^ Hackett, Robert; Carroll, William (29 July 2006). Remaking Media: The Struggle to Democratize Public Communication. Routledge. ISBN 9781134159369.
5. ^ “Adbusters
Jan/Feb 2022 – Magdogs Marketplace”. Retrieved 12 April 2022.
6. ^ Jump up to:a b Yardsley, William (28 November 2011). “The Branding of the Occupy Movement”. The New York Times. Retrieved 5 April 2012.
7. ^ “Résistance à l’Aggression Publicitaire”
(in French). Antipub.org. 13 February 2014. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
8. ^ “Casseurs de Pub” (in French). Casseurs de Pub. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
9. ^ “Buy Nothing Day Japan – Fight Pollution of Culture and Nature”. Bndjapan.org. Retrieved 3
10. ^ “Infoseek[インフォシーク] – 楽天が運営するポータルサイト”. Adbusters.cool.ne.jp. 1 January 2000. Archived from the original on 29 May 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
11. ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: “Forests Forever Ad (1988)”.
YouTube. 19 June 2009. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
12. ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: “Adbusters – Talking Forest”. YouTube. 7 November 2012. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
13. ^ “Archived copy”. www.evolutionzone.com. Archived from
the original on 22 February 2001. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
14. ^ “Adbusters: Media Carta”. adbusters.org. Archived from the original on 17 August 2000. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
15. ^ Motavalli, Jim (30 April 1996). “Cultural Jammin'”. E –
The Environmental Magazine. 7 (3): 41. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
16. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Rumbo, Joseph D. (2002). “Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case of Adbusters”. Psychology and Marketing. 19
(2): 127–48. doi:10.1002/mar.10006.
17. ^ [Marnie W. Curry-Tash, “The Politics of Teleliteracy and Adbusting in the Classroom”, English Journal 87(1), 1998]
18. ^ [ Joseph D. Rumbo, “Consumer Resistance in a World of Advertising Clutter: The Case
of Adbusters”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol.19(2), February 2002]
19. ^ Jump up to:a b c d “”Culture Jams and Meme Warfare: Kalle Lasn, Adbusters, and media activism”, Wendi Pickerel, Helena Jorgensen, and Lance Bennett, 19 April 2002″ (PDF). Retrieved
29 March 2014.
20. ^ “Adbusters Takes Canadian TV Networks to Court”. CBC News. 15 September 2004. Archived from the original on 6 December 2007.
21. ^ “Adbusters Wins Legal Victory in Ongoing Case Against the CBC and CanWest”, Marketwire.com,
6 April 2009[dead link]
22. ^ “Satya May 2005: Interview with Kalle Lasn of Adbusters”. Satyamag.com. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
23. ^ Morrow, Fiona (6 April 2009). Fiona Morrow, “Adbusters Wins Right To Sue Broadcasters over TV Ads” The Globe and
24. ^ “#118 – Adbusters | Journal of the mental environment”. Adbusters. 17 February 2015. Archived from the original on 31 October 2011. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
25. ^ Lasn, Kalle (2000). Culture Jam, New York: Quill.
26. ^ Jump up to:a
b c Heath, Joseph and Potter, Andrew. The Rebel Sell. Harper Perennial, 2004.
27. ^ Jump up to:a b “News Article – Cord Weekly”. Archived from the original on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 9 April 2009.
28. ^ Willan, Claude (24 July 2005). “We’re
All Borf in the End”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
29. ^ “BlackSpot Shoes : Philosophy Behind the Shoes”. Archived from the original on 22 May 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2007.
30. ^  Archived 20 July 2008 at the Wayback Machine
“Rethink the Cool – from Adbusters”. Veganline.com. Retrieved 3 January 2017.
32. ^ Jump up to:a b Aitch, Iain (15 December 2003). “Kicking against the system”. The Independent. Archived from the original on 6 December 2007. Retrieved 20 November
33. ^ “Blackspot | Adbusters Culturejammer Headquarters”. Archived from the original on 20 July 2008. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
34. ^ Jump up to:a b “Blackspot – Blackspot Shoes”. Adbusters.org. Archived from the original on 20 July 2008.
Retrieved 29 March 2014.
35. ^ “Support + Subscribe”. Adbusters.org. Archived from the original on 19 May 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2012. Text ‘hidden’ under the “Why do we sell?” tab.
36. ^ “Meet the Antipreneurs”. businessweek.com. June–July
2008. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009. Retrieved 31 July 2008.
37. ^ Jump up to:a b Fleming, Andrew (27 September 2011). “Adbusters sparks Wall Street protest Vancouver-based activists behind street actions in the U.S”. The Vancouver
Courier. Archived from the original on 11 October 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2011.
38. ^ Sira Lazar “Occupy Wall Street: Interview With Micah White From Adbusters”, Huffington Post, 7 October 2011, at 3:40 in interview
39. ^ “#OCCUPYWALLSTREET
| Adbusters Culturejammer Headquarters”. Archived from the original on 2 November 2011. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
40. ^ Beeston, Laura (11 October 2011). “The Ballerina and the Bull: Adbusters’ Micah White on ‘The Last Great Social Movement'”.
The Link. Retrieved 12 October 2011.
41. ^ Schneider, Nathan (29 September 2011). “Occupy Wall Street: FAQ”. The Nation. Retrieved 12 October 2011.
42. ^ “Radical environmentalists urge people to target ‘wealthy areas,’ deflate SUV tires”. New
York Post. 11 April 2022. Retrieved 12 April 2022.
43. ^ McLaren, Carrie. “Culture Jamming ™: Brought To You By Adbusters Archived 25 August 2005 at the Wayback Machine.” Stay Free!. Retrieved 13 September 2005.
44. ^ Jump up to:a b Friesen,
Joe (15 September 2004). “Adbusters suing networks for not airing its TV spots”. The Globe and Mail.
45. ^ Lasn, Kalle (March–April 2004). “Why won’t anyone say they are Jewish?”. Adbusters. Archived from the original on 23 February 2004. Here
at Adbusters, we decided to tackle the issue head on and came up with a carefully researched list of who appear to be the 50 most influential neocons in the US (see above). Deciding who exactly is a neocon is difficult since some neocons reject the
term while others embrace it. Some shape policy from within the White House, while others are more peripheral, exacting influence indirectly as journalists, academics and think tank policy wonks. What they all share is the view that the US is a benevolent
hyper power that must protect itself by reshaping the rest of the world into its morally superior image. And half of them are Jewish.
46. ^ “Adbusters, Max Cleland, and more”. The Weekly Standard. 8 March 2004. Archived from the original on 26 December
2007. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
47. ^ Hoffer, Steven (4 November 2010). “Adbusters Yanked From Store Shelves; Anti-Semitic Photo to Blame?”. AOL News. Archived from the original on 1 February 2011. Retrieved 5 March 2011. The anti-consumerist,
culture-jamming Adbusters magazine – recently known as the hipster publication that ragged on hipsters – is being taken off the shelves at Canadian drugstore chain Shoppers Drug Mart following a dispute over a “Truthbombs” photo spread juxtaposing
images of Gaza and the Warsaw Ghetto, according to The Globe and Mail.
48. ^ Mohammad, Saeed David (9 June 2009). “Never Again: A Ghettoized Gaza Bears Striking Resemblance to the Warsaw Ghetto”. Adbusters. Archived from the original on 11 June
2011. Retrieved 18 February 2011.
49. ^ “Bernie Farber and Len Rudner: Selling anti-Semitism in the book stores”. Archived from the original on 13 July 2012. The argument is obscene, and continues the disgusting tradition of some supporters of the
Palestinian cause to turn Jews into Nazis and Palestinians into Jews. In so doing, these propagandists not only demonize Israelis (i.e., Jews), but minimize the murderous extent and intent of Nazism’s genocidal project. In other words, such vile
analogies become a form of Holocaust minimilization
50. ^ Lasn, Kalle (2 November 2010). “A Tale of Two Ghettoes”. National Post. Canada. Archived from the original on 5 November 2010. In Canada, we should be free to choose from a diversity of viewpoints
and decide for ourselves what is anti-Semitic and what is a legitimate critique of Israel’s occupation of Palestine.
51. ^ “Adbusters Magazine Compares Convicted Palestinian Terrorist to Nelson Mandela”. Honest Reporting Canada. 11 July 2022. Retrieved
11 July 2022.
52. ^ “Adbusters: journal of the mental environment.” Counterpoise. Gainesville: 30 April 2000. Vol. 4, Iss. 1/2; p. 71
Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/archetypefotografie/3749091071/’]