• [14][15] Masala films generally fall under the musical film genre, of which Indian cinema has been the largest producer since the 1960s when it exceeded the American film
    industry’s total musical output after musical films declined in the West; the first Indian musical talkie was Alam Ara (1931), several years after the first Hollywood musical talkie The Jazz Singer (1927).

  • Hindi cinema can be insular, and relatives of film-industry figures have an edge in obtaining coveted roles in films or being part of a film crew.

  • Around the same time, filmmakers and actors from the Calcutta film industry began migrating to Bombay; as a result, Bombay became the center of Hindustani-language film production.

  • [112] Influence of Hindi cinema India Perhaps Hindi cinema’s greatest influence has been on India’s national identity, where (with the rest of Indian cinema) it has become
    part of the “Indian story”.

  • Although most early Bombay films were unabashedly escapist, a number of filmmakers tackled tough social issues or used the struggle for Indian independence as a backdrop for
    their films.

  • [114] Bollywood has long influenced Indian society and culture as the biggest entertainment industry; many of the country’s musical, dancing, wedding and fashion trends are

  • [141] Very few non-Indian actors are able to make a mark in Hindi cinema, although many have tried.

  • “[147] Contemporary mainstream films also use English; according to the article “Bollywood Audiences Editorial”, “English has begun to challenge the ideological work done
    by Urdu.

  • [60][61] Film critics polled by the British magazine Sight & Sound included several of Dutt’s films in a 2002 list of greatest films,[62] and Time’s All-Time 100 Movies lists
    Pyaasa as one of the greatest films of all time.

  • Bollywood fashion trendsetters have included Hindi films have also had a socio-political impact on Indian society, reflecting Indian politics.

  • [13] The most popular commercial genre in Hindi cinema since the 1970s has been the masala film, which freely mixes different genres including action, comedy, romance, drama
    and melodrama along with musical numbers.

  • [139] Bollywood plays a major role, however, in Indian fashion.

  • During the 2000s, Hindi cinema began influencing musical films in the Western world and was instrumental role in reviving the American musical film.

  • Virdi notes that although Urdu was widely used in classic Hindi cinema decades after partition because it was widely taught in pre-partition India, its use has declined in
    modern Hindi cinema: “The extent of Urdu used in commercial Hindi cinema has not been stable … the ultimate victory of Hindi in the official sphere has been more or less complete.

  • [103] Todd Stadtman identifies several foreign influences on 1970s commercial Bollywood masala films, including New Hollywood, Italian exploitation films, and Hong Kong martial
    arts cinema.

  • [113] Scholar Brigitte Schulze has written that Indian films, most notably Mehboob Khan’s Mother India (1957), played a key role in shaping the Republic of India’s national
    identity in the early years after independence from the British Raj; the film conveyed a sense of Indian nationalism to urban and rural citizens alike.

  • [34][35] Themes from the Independence Movement deeply influenced Bombay film directors, screen-play writers, and lyricists, who saw their films in the context of social reform
    and the problems of the common people.

  • [85][86] It brought back the template for Bollywood musical romance films which went on to define 1990s Hindi cinema.

  • [36] Before the Partition, the Bombay film industry was closely linked to the Lahore film industry (now the Pakistani film industry also known as “Lollywood”); both produced
    films in Hindustani (also known as Hindi-Urdu), the lingua franca of northern and central India.

  • [29] With a great demand for talkies and musicals, Hindustani cinema (as Hindi cinema was then known as)[30] and the other regional film industries quickly switched to sound

  • [3][5][6] In 2017, Indian cinema produced 1,986 feature films, of which the largest number, 364 have been in Hindi.

  • Alongside commercial masala films, a distinctive genre of art films known as parallel cinema has also existed, presenting realistic content and avoidance of musical numbers.

  • [136] A film’s music and song and dance portions are usually produced first and these are often released before the film itself, increasing its audience.

  • [99][100] Most stars from the 2000s continued successful careers into the next decade, and the 2010s saw a new generation of popular actors in different films.

  • [45] Mehboob Khan’s Mother India (1957), a remake of his earlier Aurat (1940), was the first Indian film nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film; it
    lost by a single vote.

  • [7] Hindi cinema is one of the largest centres for film production in the world.

  • Hindi cinema, popularly known as Bollywood and formerly as Bombay cinema,[4] refers to the film industry based in Mumbai, engaged in production of motion pictures in Hindi

  • Its critical and commercial success led to the emergence of a genre known as Mumbai noir:[96] urban films reflecting the city’s social problems.

  • [16][22] “Bollywood” has since inspired a long list of Hollywood-inspired nicknames.

  • [32] The film tackled contemporary issues, especially those arising from the Indian Independence movement, and went on to become “the longest running hit of Indian cinema”,
    a title it held till the 1970s.

  • [63] During the late 1960s and early 1970s, the industry was dominated by musical romance films with romantic-hero leads.

  • [50] Written and produced by Dilip Kumar, Gunga Jumna was a dacoit crime drama about two brothers on opposite sides of the law (a theme which became common in Indian films
    during the 1970s).

  • The blend of Hindi and English sometimes heard in modern Hindi films, known as Hinglish, has become increasingly common.

  • Many Asian Underground artists, particularly those among the overseas Indian diaspora, have also been inspired by Bollywood music.

  • [45][80] Although the art film bent of the Film Finance Corporation was criticised during a 1976 Committee on Public Undertakings investigation which accused the corporation
    of not doing enough to encourage commercial cinema, the decade saw the rise of commercial cinema with films such as Sholay (1975) which consolidated Amitabh Bachchan’s position as a star.

  • Their critical acclaim and the latter’s commercial success paved the way for Indian neorealism and the Indian New Wave (synonymous with parallel cinema).

  • It is true that many Urdu words have survived and have become part of Hindi cinema’s popular vocabulary.

  • The industry is a part of the larger Indian cinema, which also includes South Indian cinema and other smaller film industries.

  • Bollywood films are also notorious for lack or less of Foley sound, due to which most of the times audience don’t experience all the sounds from objects on screen.

  • Golden age (late 1940s–1960s) The period from the late 1940s to the early 1960s, after India’s independence, is regarded by film historians as the Golden Age of Hindi cinema.

  • [75] After the success of Bruce Lee films (such as Enter the Dragon) in India,[110] Deewaar (1975) and other Bollywood films incorporated fight scenes inspired by 1970s martial
    arts films from Hong Kong cinema until the 1990s.

  • A large Indian diaspora in English-speaking countries and increased Western influence in India have nudged Bollywood films closer to Hollywood.

  • [94][95] The decade marked the entrance of new performers in art and independent films, some of which were commercially successful.

  • [86] Known since the 1990s as “New Bollywood”,[87] contemporary Bollywood is linked to economic liberalization in India during the early 1990s.

  • Usually Hindi film’s makers do not write Foley artist’s name in end credits.

  • New Hindi cinema (1990s–2000s) Hindi cinema experienced another period of stagnation during the late 1980s with a box-office decline due to increasing violence, a decline
    in musical quality, and a rise in video piracy.

  • Since many Bollywood films are shot abroad, many foreign extras are employed.

  • The films explored social themes, primarily dealing with working-class life in India (particularly urban life) in the first two examples.

  • [98] During the 2010s, the industry saw established stars such as making big-budget masala films with much-younger actresses.

  • [139] Studies have indicated that some people, unaware that changing fashion in Bollywood films is often influenced by globalisation, consider the clothes worn by Bollywood
    actors as authentically Indian.

  • [42][43][44] Some of the most critically acclaimed Hindi films of all time were produced during this time.

  • [41] These events further consolidated the Bombay film industry’s position as the preeminent center for film production in India.

  • “[140] Although Bollywood plots feature Westernised urbanites dating and dancing in clubs rather than pre-arranged marriages, traditional Indian culture continues to exist
    outside the industry and is an element of resistance by some to Western influences.

  • • Western musical television (particularly MTV), which has had an increasing influence since the 1990s.

  • While commercial Hindi cinema was thriving, the 1950s also saw the emergence of a parallel cinema movement.

  • Parallel cinema films tended to be less popular at the box office.

  • Its pace, camera angles, dance sequences and music may be seen in 2000s Indian films.

  • [51] Some of the best-known epic films of Hindi cinema were also produced at this time, such as K. Asif’s Mughal-e-Azam (1960).

  • [37] Another centre of Hindustani-language film production was the Bengal film industry in Calcutta, Bengal Presidency (now Kolkata, West Bengal), which produced Hindustani-language
    films and local Bengali language films.

  • In more recent years, the distinction between commercial masala and parallel cinema has been gradually blurring, with an increasing number of mainstream films adopting the
    conventions which were once strictly associated with parallel cinema.

  • [46] Mother India defined conventional Hindi cinema for decades.

  • [17] “Bollywood” was probably invented in Bombay-based film trade journals in the 1960s or 1970s, though the exact inventor varies by account.

  • Main distributors: AA Films, Dharma Productions, Eros International, Excel Entertainment, Star Studios, Red Chillies Entertainment, Reliance Entertainment, Tips Industries,
    UTV Motion Pictures, Viacom18 Studios, Yash Raj Films, Zee Studios[1][2]; Produced feature films (2017)[3]: Total: 364 The term Bollywood “Bollywood” is a portmanteau derived from Bombay (the former name of Mumbai) and “Hollywood”, a shorthand
    reference for the American film industry which is based in Hollywood, California.

  • [45] Although the movement (emphasising social realism) was led by Bengali cinema, it also began gaining prominence in Hindi cinema.

  • [98] Some of the largest production houses, among them Yash Raj Films and Dharma Productions were the producers of new modern films.

  • [149] Characters may shift from one language to the other to evoke a particular atmosphere (for example, English in a business setting and Hindi in an informal one).

  • Matthew Jones of De Montfort University also identifies the Sanskrit concept of rasa, or “the emotions felt by the audience as a result of the actor’s presentation”, as crucial
    to Bollywood films.


Works Cited

[‘ “Bollywood Distributors”. Variety. 10 September 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2018.
1. ^ “Leading Distributors 1995–2018”. The Numbers. Retrieved 13 August 2018.
2. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Indian Feature Films Certified During The Year 2017”. Film Federation
of India. 31 March 2017. Archived from the original on 24 November 2018. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
3. ^ Gulzar, Nihalani & Chatterjee 2003.
4. ^ “‘The word B’wood is derogatory'”. The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 11 November
2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
5. ^ Richard Corliss (16 September 1996). “Hooray for Bollywood!”. Time. Archived from the original on 19 January 2007.
6. ^ “The Digital March Media & Entertainment in South India” (PDF). Deloitte. Archived (PDF)
from the original on 14 January 2016. Retrieved 21 April 2014.
7. ^ Pippa de Bruyn; Niloufer Venkatraman; Keith Bain (2006). Frommer’s India. Frommer’s. p. 579. ISBN 978-0-471-79434-9.
8. ^ Wasko, Janet (2003). How Hollywood works. Sage. p.
185. ISBN 978-0-7619-6814-6.
9. ^ K. Jha; Subhash (2005). The Essential Guide to Bollywood. Roli Books. p. 1970. ISBN 978-81-7436-378-7.
10. ^ Jha, Lata (31 January 2023). “Footfalls for Hindi films slump up to 50%”. Mint. Retrieved 14 February
2023. Footfalls for Hindi cinema fell to 189 million in 2022 from 341 million in 2019, 316 million in 2018 and 301 million in 2017, according to media consulting firm Ormax.
11. ^ “Despite slowdown, theatres see 8.9% jump in footfalls in 2019”.
Moneycontrol. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
12. ^ Jump up to:a b c
 Saxena, Akshya (March 2022). Vernacular English: Reading the Anglophone in Postcolonial India. Princeton University Press. pp. 170–171. ISBN 978-0-691-22313-1. Scholars of
Hindi-Urdu film noted a gradual replacement of Urdu with English in these films… the “ideological work” of Urdu— its evocation of a pre- Partition composite culture and business practices— “has now been challenged by English, which provides the
ideological coordinates of the new world of the Hindi film.
 Varia, Kush (31 January 2013). Bollywood: Gods, Glamour, and Gossip. Columbia University Press. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-231-50260-3. The specific use of Hindi/Urdu has shifted through
time with the films produced in the pre-independence era having a leaning towards Urdu and those of the post independence era leaning towards Hindi… The use of Urdu has gradually declined since independence…
 M Madhava, Prasad (1 August
2008). “Surviving Bollywood”. In Kavoori, Anandam P.; Punathambekar, Aswin (eds.). Global Bollywood. NYU Press. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-8147-2944-1.
 Ganti, Tejaswini (2004). Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema. Psychology Press. p. 69.
ISBN 978-0-415-28854-5.
 Virdi, Jyotika (2003). The Cinematic ImagiNation [sic]: Indian Popular Films as Social History. Rutgers University Press. pp. 20–21. ISBN 978-0-8135-3191-5. …the extent of Urdu used in commercial Hindi cinema has
not been stable… Although the shift was gradual and two generations communicated with each other through a blend of Urdu and Hindi, known as Hindustani, the ultimate victory of Hindi in the official sphere has been more or less complete… The decline
of Urdu is mirrored in Hindi films… It is true that many Urdu words have survived and have become part of Hindi cinema’s popular vocabulary. But that is as far as it goes.
13. ^ Jump up to:a b Tejaswini Ganti (2004). Bollywood: a guidebook to
popular Hindi cinema. Psychology Press. pp. 22–23. ISBN 978-0-415-28854-5. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
14. ^ Nelmes, Jill. An introduction to film studies. p. 367.
15. ^ Jump up to:a b Rajghatta, Chidanand (6 July 2008). “Bollywood in Hollywood”.
The Times of India. Retrieved 20 February 2009.
16. ^ Jump up to:a b Sarkar, Bhaskar (2008). “The Melodramas of Globalization”. Cultural Dynamics. 20: 31–51 [34]. doi:10.1177/0921374007088054. S2CID 143977618. Madhava Prasad traces the origin of
the term to a 1932 article in the American Cinematographer by Wilford E. Deming, an American engineer who apparently helped produce the first Indian sound picture. At this point, the Calcutta suburb of Tollygunge was the main center of film production
in India. Deming refers to the area as Tollywood, since it already boasted two studios with ‘several more projected’ (Prasad, 2003) ‘Tolly’, rhyming with ‘Holly’, got hinged to ‘wood’ in the Anglophone Indian imagination, and came to denote
the Calcutta studios and, by extension, the local film industry. Prasad surmises: ‘Once Tollywood was made possible by the fortuitous availability of a half-rhyme, it was easy to clone new Hollywood babies by simply replacing the first letter’ (Prasad,
17. ^ Rajadhyaksha, Ashish (1 January 2003). “The ‘Bollywoodization’ of the Indian Cinema: Cultural Nationalism in a Global Arena”. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. 4 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1080/1464937032000060195. ISSN 1464-9373. S2CID 144764499.
18. ^
Jump up to:a b Subhash K Jha (8 April 2005). “Amit Khanna: The Man who saw ‘Bollywood'”. Sify. Archived from the original on 9 April 2005. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
19. ^ Jump up to:a b c Anand (7 March 2004). “On the Bollywood beat”. The Hindu.
Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 3 April 2004. Retrieved 31 May 2009.
20. ^ Jha, Subhash K (1 April 2005). “The Bollywood Man”. The Telegraph (Calcutta). Retrieved 10 March 2019.
21. ^ Crusie, Jennifer; Yeffeth, Glenn (2005). Flirting
with Pride & Prejudice. BenBella Books, Inc. p. 92. ISBN 978-1-932100-72-3.
22. ^ McKernan, Luke (31 December 1996). “Hiralal Sen (copyright British Film Institute)”. Retrieved 1 November 2006.
23. ^ Hutchinson, Pamela (25 July 2013). “The birth
of India’s film industry: how the movies came to Mumbai”. The Guardian. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
24. ^ Vāṭave, Bāpū; Trust, National Book (2004). Dadasaheb Phalke, the father of Indian cinema. ISBN 9788123743196. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
25. ^
Sharma, Sachin (28 June 2012). “Godhra forgets its days spent with Dadasaheb Phalke”. The Times of India. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2012.
26. ^ Vilanilam, J. V. (2005). Mass Communication in India: A Sociological
Perspective. New Delhi: Sage Publications. p. 128. ISBN 978-81-7829-515-2.
27. ^ Gulzar, Nihalani & Chatterjee 2003, p. 136-137.
28. ^ “Talking Images, 75 Years of Cinema”. The Tribune. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
29. ^ Gulzar, Nihalani & Chatterjee
2003, p. 146.
30. ^ Gulzar; Nihalani, Govind; Chatterji, Saibal (2003). Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema. Encyclopædia Britannica (India) Pvt Ltd. pp. 136–137. ISBN 978-81-7991-066-5.
31. ^ Unny, Divya (19 March 2014). “B-Town rewind: The tale of
the first Bollywood crore”. Jagran Group. Retrieved 7 November 2020. However, it was in 1943, that Kismet, directed by Gyan Mukherjee, became the first film to reach the coveted box office milestone of Rs 1 crore. Who would have thought
that the journey of the crore in Indian films would begin with a movie made for under Rs 2 lakh? It was a time when India was in the throes of patriotic fervour. The Quit India movement had just been launched. Kismet, a crime thriller with patriotic
sentiments, tapped into this feeling.
32. ^ Mishra, Vijay (January 1992). “Decentering History: Some Versions of Bombay Cinema”. East-West Film Journal. Honolulu, HI, USA: East-West Center. 6 (1). The next canonical text was Luck (Kismet, 1943),
which, in 1970 at any rate, held the “record as the longest running hit of Indian cinema” (Star and Style, February 6, 1970,19). [Luck] owes its amazing, unexpected success to the time in which it was made.” Achut Kanya and Kismet heralded a move
away from what Shyam Benegal called alienating and orientalist cinema to movies that could “deal with reality”
33. ^ Agarwal, Bhumika (August 2013). “IPTA’s Contribution in Awakening Nationalism”. The Criterion. Kolhapur, MH, India: Rajaram College.
4 (4). Indian People’s Theatre Association, popularly known by its acronym IPTA, was formed in 1942 when India was struggling to free herself from the shackles of colonial rule. The established artists of the tmmes Prithviraj Kapoor, Bijon Bhattacharya,
Ritwik Ghatak, Utpal Dutt, Khwaja Ahmad Abbas, Mulk Raj Anand, Salil Chowdhury, Pandit Ravi Shankar, Jyotirindra Moitra, Niranjan Singh Maan, S. Tera Singh Chan, Jagdish Faryadi, Khalili Faryadi, Rajendra Raghuvanshi, Safdar Mir and many others came
forward and formed Indian People’s Theatre Association (IPTA) in 1942.
34. ^ “Remembering Prithviraj Kapoor”. Living Media India Limited. 3 November 2016. Retrieved 7 November 2020. In 1946, Prithviraj Kapoor founded Prithvi Theatres,
a theatre group that became a legend over decades. The house would stage influential patriotic plays and inspire the generation to join the Indian freedom movement and Mahatma Gandhi’s Quit India movement
35. ^ Bandidiwekar, Anjali (2008). Bollywood
and Social Issues: Dichotomy or Symbiosis?. Hyderabad, India: ICFAI books. p. 43. Indian cinema grew up in the days of the National Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi. The Gandhian philosophy of social reform deeply influenced Bollywood directors, screen-play
writers, and lyricists. Their films became vehicles of social reform, taking up the cause of the common people.
36. ^ Jump up to:a b c Ghosh, Partha S. (2016). Migrants, Refugees and the Stateless in South Asia. SAGE Publications. p. 263. ISBN 9789351508557.
37. ^
Bose, Mihir (2017). From Midnight to Glorious Morning? India Since Independence. Haus Publishing. p. 182. ISBN 9781910376706.
38. ^ Jump up to:a b c Raju, Zakir Hossain (2014). Bangladesh Cinema and National Identity: In Search of the Modern?. Routledge.
p. 131. ISBN 978-1-317-60181-4.
39. ^ Bose, Mihir (2017). From Midnight to Glorious Morning?: India Since Independence. Haus Publishing. p. 182. ISBN 978-1-910376-70-6.
40. ^ Khan, M. Ilyas (29 November 2012). “Bollywood’s Shah Rukh Khan, Dilip
Kumar and the Peshawar club”. BBC News. Retrieved 22 June 2019.
41. ^ K. Moti Gokulsing, K. Gokulsing, Wimal Dissanayake (2004). Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. Trentham Books. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-85856-329-9.
42. ^ Sharpe,
Jenny (2005). “Gender, Nation, and Globalization in Monsoon Wedding and Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge”. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism. 6 (1): 58–81 [60 & 75]. doi:10.1353/mer.2005.0032. S2CID 201783566.
43. ^ Gooptu, Sharmistha (July
2002). “Reviewed work(s): The Cinemas of India (1896–2000) by Yves Thoraval”. Economic and Political Weekly. 37 (29): 3023–4.
44. ^ Jump up to:a b c d K. Moti Gokulsing, K. Gokulsing, Wimal Dissanayake (2004). Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative
of Cultural Change. Trentham Books. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-85856-329-9.
45. ^ Khanna, Priyanka (24 February 2008). “For Bollywood, Oscar is a big yawn again”. Thaindian News. Archived from the original on 30 September 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.
46. ^
Sridharan, Tarini (25 November 2012). “Mother India, not Woman India”. The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 6 January 2013. Retrieved 5 March 2012.
47. ^ Bollywood Blockbusters: Mother India (Part 1) (Documentary). CNN-IBN. 2009.
Archived from the original on 15 July 2015.
48. ^ Kehr, Dave (23 August 2002). “Mother India (1957). Film in review; ‘Mother India'”. The New York Times. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
49. ^ Jump up to:a b Teo, Stephen (2017). Eastern Westerns: Film
and Genre Outside and Inside Hollywood. Taylor & Francis. p. 122. ISBN 978-1-317-59226-6.
50. ^ Jump up to:a b Tejaswini Ganti, Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema, page 153
51. ^ “Film Festival – Bombay Melody”. University of California,
Los Angeles. 17 March 2004. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
52. ^ Jump up to:a b Before Brando, There Was Dilip Kumar, The Quint, 11 December 2015
53. ^ Jump up to:a b “Unmatched innings”. The Hindu. 24 January
2012. Archived from the original on 8 February 2012. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
54. ^ Sen, Raja (29 June 2011). “Readers Choice: The Greatest Actresses of all time”. Retrieved 19 September 2011.
55. ^ Jump up to:a b c Ahmed, Rauf. “The
Present”. Archived from the original on 29 May 2008. Retrieved 30 June 2008.
56. ^ Jump up to:a b Rajadhyaksha, Ashish (2016). Indian Cinema: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 61. ISBN 978-0-19-103477-0.
57. ^
Jump up to:a b Maker of innovative, meaningful movies. The Hindu, 15 June 2007
58. ^ Srikanth Srinivasan (4 August 2008). “Do Bigha Zamin: Seeds of the Indian New Wave”. Dear Cinema. Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Retrieved 3 August
59. ^ Jump up to:a b “India and Cannes: A Reluctant Courtship”. Passion For Cinema. 2008. Archived from the original on 20 June 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2009.
60. ^ Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2004). Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative
of Cultural Change. Trentham Books. pp. 18–9. ISBN 978-1-85856-329-9.
61. ^ “2002 Sight & Sound Top Films Survey of 253 International Critics & Film Directors”. Cinemacom. 2002. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
62. ^ “All-Time 100 Best Movies”. Time.
12 February 2005. Archived from the original on 23 May 2005. Retrieved 19 May 2008.
63. ^ Jump up to:a b “Revisiting Prakash Mehra’s Zanjeer: The film that made Amitabh Bachchan”. The Indian Express. 20 June 2017.
64. ^ “Salim-Javed: Writing
Duo that Revolutionized Indian Cinema”. Pandolin. 25 April 2013. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
65. ^ Jump up to:a b c Chaudhuri, Diptakirti (1 October 2015). Written by Salim-Javed: The Story of Hindi
Cinema’s Greatest Screenwriters. Penguin UK. ISBN 9789352140084.
66. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Raj, Ashok (2009). Hero Vol.2. Hay House. p. 21. ISBN 9789381398036.
67. ^ Ganti, Tejaswini (2004). Bollywood: A Guidebook to Popular Hindi Cinema.
Psychology Press. p. 153. ISBN 978-0-415-28854-5.
68. ^ Chaudhuri, Diptakirti (2015). Written by Salim-Javed: The Story of Hindi Cinema’s Greatest Screenwriters. Penguin Books. p. 72. ISBN 9789352140084.
69. ^ Jump up to:a b Kumar, Surendra (2003).
Legends of Indian cinema: pen portraits. Har-Anand Publications. p. 51. ISBN 9788124108727.
70. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Mazumdar, Ranjani (2007). Bombay Cinema: An Archive of the City. University of Minnesota Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-4529-1302-5.
71. ^
Jump up to:a b Chaudhuri, Diptakirti (2015). Written by Salim-Javed: The Story of Hindi Cinema’s Greatest Screenwriters. Penguin Group. p. 74. ISBN 9789352140084.
72. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Deewaar was the perfect script: Amitabh Bachchan on 42 years
of the cult film”. Hindustan Times. 29 January 2017.
73. ^ Jump up to:a b c Amitava Kumar (23 December 2008). “Slumdog Millionaire’s Bollywood Ancestors”. Vanity Fair. Retrieved 4 January 2008.
74. ^ Jump up to:a b Stadtman, Todd (2015). Funky
Bollywood: The Wild World of 1970s Indian Action Cinema. FAB Press. ISBN 978-1-903254-77-6.
75. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Chaudhuri, Diptakirti (1 October 2015). Written by Salim-Javed: The Story of Hindi Cinema’s Greatest Screenwriters. Penguin UK.
p. 58. ISBN 9789352140084.
76. ^ “How film-maker Nasir Husain started the trend for Bollywood masala films”. Hindustan Times. 30 March 2017.
77. ^ Jump up to:a b Kaushik Bhaumik, An Insightful Reading of Our Many Indian Identities, The Wire, 12
March 2016
78. ^ Rachel Dwyer (2005). 100 Bollywood films. Lotus Collection, Roli Books. p. 14. ISBN 978-81-7436-433-3. Retrieved 6 August 2013.
79. ^ Rajadhyaksa, 685
80. ^ Rajadhyaksa, 688
81. ^ “Amitabh Bachchan Hindi film industry’s most
expensive star, Hema Malini tops among women”. India Today. 15 February 1983.
82. ^ “Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average)”. World Bank. 1983. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
83. ^ Films in Review. Then and There Media, LCC. 1986. p.
368. And then I had forgotten that lndia leads the world in film production, with 833 motion pictures (up from 741 the previous year).
84. ^ Chintamani, Gautam (2016). Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak: The Film That Revived Hindi Cinema. HarperCollins. ISBN
85. ^ Jump up to:a b Ray, Kunal (18 December 2016). “Romancing the 1980s”. The Hindu.
86. ^ Sen, Meheli (2017). Haunting Bollywood: Gender, Genre, and the Supernatural in Hindi Commercial Cinema. University of Texas Press. p. 189.
ISBN 978-1-4773-1158-5.
87. ^ Joshi, Priya (2015). Bollywood’s India: A Public Fantasy. Columbia University Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-231-53907-4.
88. ^ Jump up to:a b c d “Impact of Bollywood on Indian Culture”. DESIblitz. 15 January 2014.
89. ^
Cain, Rob. “Are Bollywood’s Three Khans The Last of the Movie Kings?”. Forbes.
90. ^ After Aamir, SRK, Salman, why Bollywood’s next male superstar may need a decade to rise, Firstpost, 16 October 2016
91. ^ “Why Aamir Khan Is The King of Khans:
Foreign Media”.
92. ^ D’Cunha, Suparna Dutt. “Why ‘Dangal’ Star Aamir Khan Is The New King of Bollywood”. Forbes.
93. ^ Stacey Yount, Akshay Kumar on Filmi things, BollySpice, 2 March 2008 Archived 9 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine
94. ^
“Akshay Kumar meets Jackie Chan in Hong Kong”. Bollywood Hungama. 20 May 2004. Archived from the original on 23 March 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
95. ^ Jump up to:a b Aruti Nayar (16 December 2007). “Bollywood on the table”. The Tribune. Retrieved
19 June 2008.
96. ^ Christian Jungen (4 April 2009). “Urban Movies: The Diversity of Indian Cinema”. FIPRESCI. Archived from the original on 17 June 2009. Retrieved 11 May 2009.
97. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Anita N. Wadhwani. “Bollywood Mania”
Rising in United States Archived 20 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine. US State Department. (9 August 2006). Retrieved 29 July 2010.
98. ^ Rangan, Baradwaj (8 January 2017). “Masala redux”. The Hindu. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
99. ^ “Secret
Superstar: A moving slice of life”. The Asian Age. 2 November 2017.
100. ^ Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2004). Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change. Trentham Books. pp. 98–99. ISBN 978-1-85856-329-9.
101. ^ Matthew
Jones (January 2010). “Bollywood, Rasa and Indian Cinema: Misconceptions, Meanings and Millionaire”. Visual Anthropology. 23 (1): 33–43. doi:10.1080/08949460903368895. S2CID 144974842.
102. ^ Gooptu, Sharmistha (2010). Bengali Cinema: ‘An Other
Nation’. Routledge. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-136-91217-7.
103. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Aḵẖtar, Jāvīd; Kabir, Nasreen Munni (2002). Talking Films: Conversations on Hindi Cinema with Javed Akhtar. Oxford University Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-19-566462-1. JA:
I write dialogue in Urdu, but the action and descriptions are in English. Then an assistant transcribes the Urdu dialogue into Devnagari because most people read Hindi. But I write in Urdu. Not only me, I think most of the writers working in this
so-called Hindi cinema write in Urdu: Gulzar, or Rajinder Singh Bedi or Inder Raj Anand or Rahi Masoom Raza or Vahajat Mirza, who wrote dialogue for films like Mughal-e-Azam and Gunga Jumna and Mother India. So most dialogue-writers and most song-writers
are from the Urdu discipline, even today.
104. ^ Jump up to:a b c Chaudhuri, Diptakirti (2015). Written by Salim-Javed: The Story of Hindi Cinema’s Greatest Screenwriters. Penguin Books. ISBN 9789352140084.
105. ^ Jump up to:a b c Dwyer, Rachel
(2006). Filming the Gods: Religion and Indian Cinema. Routledge. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-134-38070-1.
106. ^ Jump up to:a b “Film World”. Film World. T.M. Ramachandran. 10: 65. 1974. Two eminent Urdu writers Krishan Chander and Ismat Chughtai have said
that “more than seventy-five per cent of films are made in Urdu.”
107. ^ Chaudhuri, Diptakirti (2015). Written by Salim-Javed: The Story of Hindi Cinema’s Greatest Screenwriters. Penguin Books. pp. 26–27. ISBN 9789352140084.
108. ^ “Urdu pulp
fiction: Where Gabbar Singh and Mogambo came from”. Daily News and Analysis. 10 July 2011. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
109. ^ “Bruce Lee storms Bombay once again with Return of the Dragon”. India Today. 15 September 1979. Retrieved 20 January 2015.
110. ^
Heide, William Van der (2002). Malaysian Cinema, Asian Film: Border Crossings and National Cultures. Amsterdam University Press. ISBN 9789053565803.
111. ^ Morris, Meaghan; Li, Siu Leung; Chan, Stephen Ching-kiu (2005). Hong Kong Connections: Transnational
Imagination in Action Cinema. Hong Kong University Press. p. 149. ISBN 978-1-932643-19-0.
112. ^ Jump up to:a b Desai, Lord Meghnad (4 May 2013). “How Bollywood mirrors Indian realities”. BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
113. ^ Schulze,
Brigitte (September 2002). “The Cinematic ‘Discovery of India’: Mehboob’s Re-Invention of the Nation in Mother India”. Social Scientist. 30 (9/10): 72–87. doi:10.2307/3517959. JSTOR 3517959.
114. ^ Raghavendra, M. K. (2014). The Politics of Hindi
Cinema in the New Millennium: Bollywood and the Anglophone Indian Nation. Oxford Scholarship Online. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450565.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-945056-5.
115. ^ “Baahubali 2, Dangal’s overseas box office success is a testimony
to Indian film industry’s soft power”. Firstpost. 31 May 2017.
116. ^ Jump up to:a b “A window to India’s rising soft power – Bollywood”. The Indian Express. 13 April 2017.
117. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Shah Rukh Khan as popular as Pope: German media”.
Daily News and Analysis. 10 February 2008.
118. ^ Swaminathan, Roopa (2017). Bollywood Boom: India’s Rise as a Soft Power. Random House Publishers. ISBN 9789386495143.
119. ^ “Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000 Summary
File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data”. United States Census Bureau. Archived from the original on 12 February 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
120. ^ “ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates 2013–2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates – Monroe
township, Middlesex County, New Jersey”. United States Census Bureau. Archived from the original on 13 February 2020. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
121. ^ “Comedies”. LiveAbout.
122. ^ “Guide Picks – Top Movie Musicals on Video/DVD”.
Archived from the original on 24 January 2009. Retrieved 15 May 2009.
123. ^ “Slumdog draws crowds, but not all like what they see”. The Age. Melbourne. 25 January 2009. Retrieved 24 January 2008.
124. ^ “‘Slumdog Millionaire’ has an Indian
co-director”. The Hindu. 11 January 2009. Archived from the original on 25 March 2009. Retrieved 23 January 2009.
125. ^ Jump up to:a b Mondal, Sayantan. “Amitabh Bachchan starrer ‘Deewar’ was remade in Telugu, Tamil, Malayalam – and Cantonese”. Archived from the original on 30 January 2017. Retrieved 30 January 2017.
126. ^ “The Brothers”. Hong Kong Cinemagic. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
127. ^ Morton, Lisa (2001). The Cinema
of Tsui Hark. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-0990-7.
128. ^ Volodzko, David (13 June 2015). “30 Years Later, This Chinese Film Still Echoes in Hollywood”. The Diplomat.
129. ^ Banker, Ashok (2002). Bollywood. Penguin Group. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-14-302835-2.
130. ^
Dominique Leone (19 July 2005). “Hosono & Yokoo: Cochin Moon”. Pitchfork. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
131. ^ “Truth Hurts”. VH1. 19 September 2002. Archived from the original on 13 April 2009. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
132. ^ ae naujawan hai sub kuchh
yahan – Apradh 1972 on YouTube
133. ^ Robin Denselow (2 May 2008). “Kalyanji Anandji, The Bollywood Brothers”. The Guardian. London. Retrieved 1 March 2009.
134. ^ Padmanabhan, Anil; Aditi, Khanna (22 May 2006). “Indian music by contemporary Asian
rappers and rockers is storming the West”. India Today. Retrieved 26 April 2022.
135. ^ Kalita, S. Mitra (2005). Suburban Sahibs: Three Immigrant Families And Their Passage from India to America. Rutgers University Press, p. 134. ISBN 0-8135-3318-X
136. ^
Dudrah, Rajinder Kumar (2006). Bollywood: Sociology Goes To the Movies. New Delhi: Sage Publishing India. ISBN 9789352803026. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
137. ^ Gangadhar, V. (13 April 2007). “Moving with the times”. The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived
from the original on 19 April 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
138. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Gupta, Suman; Omoniyi, Tope (2001). The Cultures of Economic Migration: International Perspectives. Ashgate Publishing Ltd. p. 202. ISBN 978-0-7546-7070-4.
139. ^
Khubchandani, Lata. “Memories of another day”. Archived from the original on 13 June 2018.
140. ^ A. Chatterji, Shoma (30 June 2007). “Where East meets West”. The Tribune. Retrieved 9 August 2008.
141. ^ Gulzar, Nihalani & Chatterjee
2003, p. 10–18.
142. ^ Jump up to:a b “Decoding the Bollywood poster”. National Science and Media Museum. 28 February 2013.
143. ^ “Film World”. Film World. 10: 65. 1974. I feel that the Government should eradicate the age-old evil of certifying
Urdu films as Hindi ones. It is a known fact that Urdu has been willingly accepted and used by the film industry. Two Urdu writers Krishan Chander and Ismat Chughtai have said that “more than seventy-five per cent of films are made in Urdu.” It is
a pity that although Urdu is freely used in films, the producers in general mention the language of the film as “Hindi” in the application forms supplied by the Censor Board. It is a gross misrepresentation and unjust to the people who love Urdu.
144. ^
Gulzar, Nihalani & Chatterjee 2003, p. 65.
145. ^ Bhaumik, Saba Naqvi (30 September 1996). “From nonsensical to sublime, Majrooh Sultanpuri still defines Bollywood frontiers”. India Today. Retrieved 7 June 2013.
146. ^ Virdi, Jyotika (2003). The
cinematic imagiNation (sic): Indian popular films as social history. Rutgers University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-8135-3191-5.
147. ^ Desai, Jigna, Dudrah, Rajinder, Rai, Amit, “Bollywood Audiences Editorial”, South Asian Popular Culture (October
2005), Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 79–82.
148. ^ Us Salam, Ziya (12 August 2007). “Assault of the mixed doubles”. The Hindu. Chennai, India. Archived from the original on 5 November 2012. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
149. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Lagaan used
synchronized sound”. The Times of India. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
150. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Samyabrata Ray Goswami (11 November 2014). “Women get makeup justice”. The Telegraph. Kolkota. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 21
April 2015.
151. ^ Amit Anand Choudhary (21 April 2015). “Bollywood make-up artists’ group inducts first woman after SC rap”. The Times of India. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
152. ^ Anantharaman, Ganesh (2008). Bollywood Melodies: A History. Penguin
Books India. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-14-306340-7. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
153. ^ Jump up to:a b c Rao, Shakuntala (2010). “”I Need an Indian Touch”: Glocalization and Bollywood Films”. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication. 3: 1–19.
154. ^ BBC News: Kashmir beckons Bollywood (10 April 2003).
155. ^ Bollywood – The Indian Cinema and Switzerland (2002). Archived 18 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine
156. ^ The Hindu: Bollywood boosts Austria’s
tourism potential. (2008).
157. ^ “Helen: Bollywood’s Queen of Dance”. The Huffington Post UK. 2 December 2012. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
158. ^ “The Tragic ending of Cuckoo Moore – Helen remembers Cuckoo”. Retrieved 5 December
159. ^ “Happy Birthday Parveen Babi”. The Indian Express. 4 April 2014. Archived from the original on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
160. ^ “World Dance Day: Top 6 dancing queens of Bollywood!”. Zee News. 28 April 2015. Retrieved
5 December 2015.
161. ^ “‘Her Story’ | Vinod Mehta | 1 Aug 2013”. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
162. ^ “Shammi Kapoor”. The Telegraph. 16 August 2011. Retrieved 5 December 2015.
163. ^ The Times of India; movie report (6
November 2011). “It took me 20 years to be an overnight success: Shah Rukh Khan”. The Times of India. Archived from the original on 17 October 2012. Retrieved 12 December 2011.
164. ^ “I & B Ministry will help film industry”. Rediff. 31 March 2001.
Retrieved 9 March 2013.
165. ^ Singh, Vijay (1 October 2003). “Bharat Shah sentenced, but won’t have to spend time in prison”. Retrieved 14 February 2008.
166. ^ Jump up to:a b Ramanan, Manju (21 February 2005). “A different canvas”.
The Times of India. Retrieved 21 November 2008.
167. ^ “Collectors can make good money with old Bollywood posters”. The Economic Times. 18 December 2011. Archived from the original on 5 May 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
168. ^ “100 years of
Indian cinema: Top 50 hand-painted Bollywood posters”. CNN-IBN. 3 May 2013. Archived from the original on 5 May 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
169. ^ Jerry Pinto; Sheena Sippy (2008). Bollywood Posters. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-28776-7.
Retrieved 20 August 2013.
170. ^ Skelton, Tracey; Allen, Tim (1999). Culture and Global Change. Routledge. p. 269. ISBN 978-0-415-13917-5.
171. ^ Ferrao, Dominic (31 January 2003). “Bollywood wakes up to the power of Web”. The Times of India.
Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 21 November 2008.
172. ^ “Leo Entertainment capitalises on film placements”. Indian Television. 14 January 2003. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
173. ^ O’Neill, Patricia (2013). “Imagining global
India: Bollywood’s transnational appeal”. Continuum. 27 (2): 254–266. doi:10.1080/10304312.2013.766309. S2CID 145444217.
174. ^ “Filmfare Awards gets new sponsor”. The Times of India. Archived from the original on 20 February 2009. Retrieved 12
November 2010.
175. ^ “Diaspora News & Network Ltd”. 4 March 2005. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
176. ^ Filmfare Awards Complete Winners List – Archived 3 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine
177. ^ Jump up to:a
b c d Larkin, Brian (31 August 2002). “Bollywood Comes To Nigeria”. Archived from the original on 31 July 2010. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
178. ^ Desai, 38
179. ^ “Dangal underlines popularity of Indian films in China”. China
Daily. 20 July 2017.
180. ^ Can new money create a world-class film industry in India?. Business Week.
181. ^ “Bollywood’s expanding reach”. BBC News. 3 May 2012. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
182. ^ “Despite official ban, Hindi movies are a craze
in Pakistan”. Archived from the original on 24 February 2008. Retrieved 5 February 2008.
183. ^ “Bollywood stumbles in Pak with Taj Mahal”. The Indian Express. 14 May 2006. Archived from the original on 30 March 2009. Retrieved 21 November 2008.
184. ^
“Will it be curtains for Indian films in Pakistan?”. ThaIndian. 9 January 2009. Archived from the original on 7 November 2016. Retrieved 23 February 2010.
185. ^ “The Mirror is Watching”. Outlook India. 1 March 2010. Archived from the original on
22 February 2010. Retrieved 23 February 2009.
186. ^ Jump up to:a b c Sudhakaran, Sreeju (10 June 2017). “Aamir Khan in China, Shah Rukh Khan in Germany – 7 Bollywood stars who have massive fan following in other countries”. Bollywood Life.
187. ^
“Bollywood set to cross LoC”. Hindustan Times. 27 January 2006.
188. ^ “It’s Bollywood all the way in Afghanistan”. @businessline. 8 May 2005. Archived from the original on 3 April 2007.
189. ^ “CNN World: Kabul TV bans ‘explicit’ Indian films,
soaps”. 29 August 2002. Archived from the original on 9 August 2009. Retrieved 26 April 2010.
190. ^ “BBC: Bollywood eyes Afghan market”. BBC News. 27 November 2001. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
191. ^ Yogendra Singh (19 November 2008). “Bollywood
in Southeast Asia”. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Archived from the original on 18 June 2009. Retrieved 18 May 2009.
192. ^ Tambunan, Shuri Mariasih Gietty (23 December 2012). “Bollywood in Indonesia: The Kuch Kuch Hota Hai effect”. Owsa.
Archived from the original on 30 January 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
193. ^ Matsuoka, Tamaki (2008). Asia to Watch, Asia to Present: The Promotion of Asian/Indian Cinema in Japan (PDF). Senri Ethnological Studies, Reitaku University. p. 246.
Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2011.
194. ^ Kohli-Khandekar, Vanita (2013). The Indian Media Business. SAGE Publications. p. 188. ISBN 9788132117889.
195. ^ “Japan is going gaga over Bollywood”. Quartz. 11 December 2014.
196. ^
“3 Idiots to race for Japan Academy Awards”. Bollywood Hungama. 27 January 2014.
197. ^ Chaerim Oh (4 December 2011). “Embrace Your Nerdiness with 3 Idiots”. KAIST Herald. KAIST. Archived from the original on 24 April 2012. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
198. ^
Jump up to:a b c “Aamir: I couldn’t really enjoy the food in China”. Rediff. 21 May 2015.
199. ^ Jump up to:a b “Aamir Khan: the second coming of Tagore?”. South China Morning Post. 28 January 2018.
200. ^ Jump up to:a b “Lagaan released in China”.
The Tribune. Press Trust of India. 20 November 2002. Archived from the original on 27 December 2007. Retrieved 12 January 2008.
201. ^ Jump up to:a b c Photo credit:’]