magna carta

 

  • [32][33] The rebels took an oath that they would “stand fast for the liberty of the church and the realm”, and demanded that the King confirm the Charter of Liberties that
    had been declared by King Henry I in the previous century, and which was perceived by the barons to protect their rights.

  • [citation needed] The charter became part of English political life and was typically renewed by each monarch in turn, although as time went by and the fledgling Parliament
    of England passed new laws, it lost some of its practical significance.

  • [99][100] Henry’s government encouraged the rebel barons to come back to his cause in exchange for the return of their lands, and reissued a version of the 1215 Charter, albeit
    having first removed some of the clauses, including those unfavourable to the Papacy and clause 61, which had set up the council of barons.

  • [39] In a further move to shore up his support, John took an oath to become a crusader, a move which gave him additional political protection under church law, even though
    many felt the promise was insincere.

  • In 1223, the tensions over the status of the charters became clear in the royal court, when Henry’s government attempted to reassert its rights over its properties and revenues
    in the counties, facing resistance from many communities that argued—if sometimes incorrectly—that the charters protected the new arrangements.

  • [103] Great Charter of 1217 See also: First Barons’ War, Charter of the Forest, and English land law The Charter of the Forest re-issued in 1225, held by the British Library
    In February 1217, Louis set sail for France to gather reinforcements.

  • [citation needed] After John’s death, the regency government of his young son, Henry III, reissued the document in 1216, stripped of some of its more radical content, in an
    unsuccessful bid to build political support for their cause.

  • [b] First drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal Stephen Langton, to make peace between the unpopular king and a group of rebel barons, it promised the protection
    of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift and impartial justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons.

  • [130][131] Uncertainty continued, and in 1227, when he was declared of age and able to rule independently, Henry announced that future charters had to be issued under his
    own seal.

  • Created: 1215; 809 years ago; Location: Two at the British Library; one each in Lincoln Castle and in Salisbury Cathedral; Author(s): John, King of England, His barons, Stephen
    Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury; Purpose: Peace treaty History 13th century Background Main article: John, King of England King John on a stag hunt Magna Carta originated as an unsuccessful attempt to achieve peace between royalist and rebel
    factions in 1215, as part of the events leading to the outbreak of the First Barons’ War.

  • In return, his followers would be given back their lands, any sentences of excommunication would be lifted, and Henry’s government would promise to enforce the charter of
    the previous year.

  • [112] The treaty was similar to the first peace offer, but excluded the rebel clergy, whose lands and appointments remained forfeit.

  • [93][138] In 1258, a group of barons seized power from Henry in a coup d’état, citing the need to strictly enforce Magna Carta and the Charter of the Forest, creating a new
    baronial-led government to advance reform through the Provisions of Oxford.

  • [41][42][43] It was John’s hope that the Pope would give him valuable legal and moral support, and accordingly John played for time; the King had declared himself to be a
    papal vassal in 1213 and correctly believed he could count on the Pope for help.

  • [26] Many contemporary writers believed that monarchs should rule in accordance with the custom and the law, with the counsel of the leading members of the realm, but there
    was no model for what should happen if a king refused to do so.

  • [citation needed] Neither side stood by their commitments, and the charter was annulled by Pope Innocent III, leading to the First Barons’ War.

  • [48][50][53] Stephen Langton’s pragmatic efforts at mediation over the next ten days turned these incomplete demands into a charter capturing the proposed peace agreement;
    a few years later, this agreement was renamed Magna Carta, meaning “Great Charter”.

  • [118][119] This resistance resulted in an argument between Archbishop Langton and William Brewer over whether the King had any duty to fulfil the terms of the charters, given
    that he had been forced to agree to them.

  • [132][133] This brought into question the validity of the previous charters issued during his minority, and Henry actively threatened to overturn the Charter of the Forest
    unless the taxes promised in return for it were actually paid.

  • At the end of the war in 1217, it formed part of the peace treaty agreed at Lambeth, where the document acquired the name “Magna Carta”, to distinguish it from the smaller
    Charter of the Forest, which was issued at the same time.

  • [29][30][31] A triumph would have strengthened his position, but in the face of his defeat, within a few months after his return from France, John found that rebel barons
    in the north and east of England were organising resistance to his rule.

  • [75] Once aware of the charter, the Pope responded in detail: in a letter dated 24 August and arriving in late September, he declared the charter to be “not only shameful
    and demeaning but also illegal and unjust” since John had been “forced to accept” it, and accordingly the charter was “null, and void of all validity for ever”; under threat of excommunication, the King was not to observe the charter, nor
    the barons try to enforce it.

  • [65] The barons were trying to force John to keep to the charter, but clause 61 was so heavily weighted against the King that this version of the charter could not survive.

  • [9][128] The content was almost identical to the 1217 versions, but in the new versions, the King declared that the charters were issued of his own “spontaneous and free will”
    and confirmed them with the royal seal, giving the new Great Charter and the Charter of the Forest of 1225 much more authority than the previous versions.

  • [60][61] Under what historians later labelled “clause 61”, or the “security clause”, a council of 25 barons would be created to monitor and ensure John’s future adherence
    to the charter.

  • Less than three months after it had been agreed, John and the loyalist barons firmly repudiated the failed charter: the First Barons’ War erupted.

  • [142] Witnesses in 1225 Witnesses to the 1225 charter Great Charter of 1297: statute 1297 version of the Great Charter, on display in the National Archives Building in Washington,
    D.C. King Edward I reissued the Charters of 1225 in 1297 in return for a new tax.

  • [93][135] He generally acted within the terms of the charters, which prevented the Crown from taking extrajudicial action against the barons, including the fines and expropriations
    that had been common under his father, John.

  • [156] In 1306 Edward I took the opportunity given by the Pope’s backing to reassert forest law over large areas which had been “disafforested”.

  • [40][44] John also began recruiting mercenary forces from France, although some were later sent back to avoid giving the impression that the King was escalating the conflict.

  • [120] On this occasion, Henry gave oral assurances that he considered himself bound by the charters, enabling a royal inquiry into the situation in the counties to progress.

  • [9] His son, Edward I, repeated the exercise in 1297, this time confirming it as part of England’s statute law.

  • [93] Despite the various charters, the provision of royal justice was inconsistent and driven by the needs of immediate politics: sometimes action would be taken to address
    a legitimate baronial complaint, while on other occasions the problem would simply be ignored.

  • [91] As an additional measure, Henry took the cross, declaring himself a crusader and thereby entitled to special protection from Rome.

  • It included a promise that Louis’ followers would be allowed to enjoy their traditional liberties and customs, referring back to the Charter of 1216.

  • [38] A mural of Pope Innocent III, c. 1219 John held a council in London in January 1215 to discuss potential reforms, and sponsored discussions in Oxford between his agents
    and the rebels during the spring.

  • [40] During the negotiations, the rebellious barons produced an initial document, which historians have termed “the Unknown Charter of Liberties”, which drew on Henry I’s
    Charter of Liberties for much of its language; seven articles from that document later appeared in the “Articles of the Barons” and the subsequent charter.

  • [70][78][79] The rebel barons concluded that peace with John was impossible, and turned to Philip II’s son, the future Louis VIII, for help, offering him the English throne.

  • [117] Henry remained a minor and his government’s legal ability to make permanently binding decisions on his behalf was limited.

  • [147] Edward, needing money, had taxed the nobility, and they had armed themselves against him, forcing Edward to issue his confirmation of Magna Carta and the Forest Charter
    to avoid civil war.

  • [91] The war was not going well for the loyalists, but Prince Louis and the rebel barons were also finding it difficult to make further progress.

  • [18][19] Research by Victorian historians showed that the original 1215 charter had concerned the medieval relationship between the monarch and the barons, rather than the
    rights of ordinary people,[20] but the charter remained a powerful, iconic document, even after almost all of its content was repealed from the statute books in the 19th and 20th centuries.

  • [81] Charters of the Welsh Princes Magna Carta was the first document in which reference is made to English and Welsh law alongside one another, including the principle of
    the common acceptance of the lawful judgement of peers.

  • [28] John was already personally unpopular with many of the barons, many of whom owed money to the Crown, and little trust existed between the two sides.

  • [109] A great council was called in October and November to take stock of the post-war situation.

  • [citation needed] Although this historical account was badly flawed, jurists such as Sir Edward Coke used Magna Carta extensively in the early 17th century, arguing against
    the divine right of kings.

  • [26] John had lost most of his ancestral lands in France to King Philip II in 1204 and had struggled to regain them for many years, raising extensive taxes on the barons to
    accumulate money to fight a war which ended in expensive failure in 1214.

  • [50][53] Although, as the historian David Carpenter has noted, the charter “wasted no time on political theory”, it went beyond simply addressing individual baronial complaints,
    and formed a wider proposal for political reform.

  • [85][86][87] The process of appointment is not known, but the names were drawn almost exclusively from among John’s more active opponents.

  • [62] If John did not conform to the charter within 40 days of being notified of a transgression by the council, the 25 barons were empowered by clause 61 to seize John’s castles
    and lands until, in their judgement, amends had been made.

  • [124] It became clear that Gascony would also fall unless reinforcements were sent from England.

  • [71][72] Despite this, the King appealed to Pope Innocent for help in July, arguing that the charter compromised the Pope’s rights as John’s feudal lord.

  • [137] The royal courts, which toured the country to provide justice at the local level, typically for lesser barons and the gentry claiming grievances against major lords,
    had little power, allowing the major barons to dominate the local justice system.

  • It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the formation of the United States Constitution, which became the supreme law of the land in the new
    republic of the United States.

  • [63] Men were to be compelled to swear an oath to assist the council in controlling the King, but once redress had been made for any breaches, the King would continue to rule
    as before.

  • [74] Meanwhile, instructions from the Pope arrived in August, written before the peace accord, with the result that papal commissioners excommunicated the rebel barons and
    suspended Langton from office in early September.

  • [57][c] Its style and content reflected Henry I’s Charter of Liberties, as well as a wider body of legal traditions, including the royal charters issued to towns, the operations
    of the Church and baronial courts and European charters such as the Statute of Pamiers.

  • Lawyers and historians at the time believed that there was an ancient English constitution, going back to the days of the Anglo-Saxons, that protected individual English freedoms.

  • [140] Louis came down firmly in favour of Henry, but the French arbitration failed to achieve peace as the rebellious barons refused to accept the verdict.

  • Chapter 57: The return of , illegitimate son of (Llywelyn the Great) along with other Welsh hostages which were originally taken for “peace” and “good”.

  • [7][8] Great Charter of 1225 1225 version of Magna Carta issued by Henry III, held in the National Archives Magna Carta became increasingly embedded into English political
    life during Henry III’s minority.

  • [50][53][54] By 15 June, general agreement had been made on a text, and on 19 June, the rebels renewed their oaths of loyalty to John and copies of the charter were formally
    issued.

  • [116] As the King grew older, his government slowly began to recover from the civil war, regaining control of the counties and beginning to raise revenue once again, taking
    care not to overstep the terms of the charters.

  • [94][95] He had substantial support though from Guala, who intended to win the civil war for Henry and punish the rebels.

  • There are also a handful of the subsequent charters in public and private ownership, including copies of the 1297 charter in both the United States and Australia.

  • [138] Henry’s rule became lax and careless, resulting in a reduction in royal authority in the provinces and, ultimately, the collapse of his authority at court.

  • [154] It was composed of 17 articles and sought in part to deal with the problem of enforcing the charters.

  • [98][99] John’s death had defused some of the rebel concerns, and the royal castles were still holding out in the occupied parts of the country.

  • [70][73] As part of the June peace deal, the barons were supposed to surrender London by 15 August, but this they refused to do.

  • [93][135] The charters did not address the sensitive issues of the appointment of royal advisers and the distribution of patronage, and they lacked any means of enforcement
    if the King chose to ignore them.

  • [128][129] The barons anticipated that the King would act in accordance with these charters, subject to the law and moderated by the advice of the nobility.

 

Works Cited

[‘The document’s Latin name is spelled either Magna Carta or Magna Charta (the pronunciation is the same), and may appear in English with or without the definite article “the”, though it is more usual for the article to be omitted.[1] Latin does not
have a definite article equivalent to “the”.
The spelling Charta originates in the 18th century, as a restoration of classical Latin charta for the Medieval Latin spelling carta.[2] While “Charta” remains an acceptable variant spelling, it never
became prevalent in English usage.[3]
o ^ Within this article, dates before 14 September 1752 are in the Julian calendar. Later dates are in the Gregorian calendar. In the Gregorian calendar, however, the date would have been 22 June 1215.
o ^
The Runnymede Charter of Liberties did not apply to Chester, which at the time was a separate feudal domain. Earl Ranulf granted his own Magna Carta of Chester.[58] Some of its articles were similar to the Runnymede Charter.[59]
o ^ Louis’s claim
to the English throne, described as “debatable” by the historian David Carpenter, derived from his wife, Blanche of Castile, who was the granddaughter of King Henry II of England. Louis argued that since John had been legitimately deposed, the barons
could then legally appoint him king over the claims of John’s son Henry.[70]
o ^ Roger de Montbegon is named in only one of the four early sources (BL, Harley MS 746, fol. 64); whereas the others name Roger de Mowbray. However, Holt believes the
Harley listing to be “the best”, and the de Mowbray entries to be an error.
o ^ Among the historians to have discussed the “myth” of Magna Carta and the ancient English constitution are Claire Breay, Geoffrey Hindley, James Holt, John Pocock, Danny
Danziger, and John Gillingham.[14][183][15][184][185]
o ^ I.e., section 1 of the 31st statute issued in the 9th year of George IV; “nor will We not” in clause 29 is correctly quoted from this source.
o “Magna Carta”. Oxford English Dictionary
(Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.) “Usually without article.”
o ^ Du Cange s.v. 1 carta
o ^ Garner, Bryan A. (1995). A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. Oxford University Press.
p. 541. ISBN 978-0195142365. “The usual—and the better—form is Magna Carta. […] Magna Carta does not take a definite article”.
Magna Charta is the recommended spelling in German-language literature. (Duden online)
o ^ “Magna Carta 1215”. British
Library. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
o ^ Peter Crooks (July 2015). “Exporting Magna Carta: exclusionary liberties in Ireland and the world”. History Ireland. 23 (4).
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1990, pp. 60–61.
o ^ Jump up to:a b White 1915,
pp. 472–475.
o ^ Jump up to:a b White 1917, pp. 545–555.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1990, p. 379.
o ^ Holt 2015, pp. 50–51.
o ^ Blick 2015, p. 39: “It was one of a number of such sets of concessions issued by kings, setting out limits on
their powers, around this time, though it had its own special character, and subsequently it has become the most celebrated and influential of them all.”
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d Hindley 1990, p. 188.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Turner 2003b, p. 140.
o ^
Jump up to:a b c d e f g Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 280.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Breay 2010, p. 46.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Hindley 1990, p. 189.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Danziger & Gillingham 2004, pp. 280–281.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c “Magna Carta
and Its American Legacy”. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c “The Magna Carta”. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Pollard 1912,
pp. 31–32.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 278.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d Breay 2010, p. 48.
o ^ “The contents of Magna Carta”. UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 28 August 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
o ^ “Magna
Carta 1297 at Legislation.gov.uk”. Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 8 December 2022.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 8.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Turner 2009, p. 149.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 7.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 168.
o ^ Turner 2009, p. 139.
o ^
Warren 1990, p. 181.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 6–7.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1990, p. 9.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2009, p. 174.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, pp. 256–258.
o ^ McGlynn 2013, pp. 131–132.
o ^ McGlynn 2013, p. 130.
o ^
Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 104.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 165.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2009, p. 178.
o ^ Jump up to:a b McGlynn 2013, p. 132.
o ^ Holt 1992a, p. 115.
o ^ Poole 1993, pp. 471–472.
o ^ Vincent 2012, pp. 59–60.
o ^
Turner 2009, p. 179.
o ^ Warren 1990, p. 233.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, pp. 258–2.
o ^ Turner 2009, pp. 174, 179–180.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d Turner 2009, p. 180.
o ^ Holt 1992a, p. 112.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d McGlynn 2013, p. 137.
o ^
Jump up to:a b Tatton-Brown 2015, p. 36.
o ^ Holt 2015, p. 219.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Warren 1990, p. 236.
o ^ Turner 2009, pp. 180, 182.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2009, p. 182.
o ^ Turner 2009, pp. 184–185.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. British Library.
Retrieved 16 March 2016.
o ^ Hewit 1929, p. 9.
o ^ Holt 1992b, pp. 379–380.
o ^ Vincent 2012, pp. 61–63.
o ^ Carpenter 2004, pp. 293–294.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2009, p. 189.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Danziger & Gillingham 2004, pp. 261–262.
o ^
Jump up to:a b Goodman 1995, pp. 260–261.
o ^ Warren 1990, pp. 239–240.
o ^ Poole 1993, p. 479.
o ^ Turner 2009, pp. 189–191.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 262.
o ^ Warren 1990, pp. 239, 242.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Carpenter 1990,
p. 12.
o ^ Carpenter 1996, p. 13.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d “All clauses”. The Magna Carta Project. University of East Anglia. Retrieved 9 November 2014.
o ^ Turner 2009, p. 190–191.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2009, p. 190.
o ^ Warren 1990,
pp. 244–245.
o ^ Rothwell 1975, pp. 324–226.
o ^ Warren 1990, pp. 245–246.
o ^ Holt 1992a, p. 1.
o ^ Crouch 1996, p. 114.
o ^ Carpenter 2004, pp. 264–267.
o ^ Warren 1990, pp. 254–255
o ^ “Magna Carta: Wales, Scotland and Ireland”. Retrieved
19 October 2022.
o ^ Smith, J. Beverley (1984). “Magna Carta and the Charters of the Welsh Princes”. The English Historical Review. XCIX (CCCXCI): 344–362. doi:10.1093/ehr/XCIX.CCCXCI.344.
o ^ “Preface”. Magna Carta Project. Retrieved 17 May 2015.
o ^
Holt 1992b, pp. 478–480:the list in the collection of law tracts is at British Library, Harley MS 746, fol. 64; the Reading Abbey list is at Lambeth Palace Library, MS 371, fol. 56v.
o ^ “Profiles of Magna Carta Sureties and Other Supporters”. Baronial
Order of Magna Charta. Retrieved 17 May 2015.
o ^ “The Magna Charta Barons at Runnymede”. Brookfield Ancestor Project. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Strickland, Matthew (2005). “Enforcers of Magna Carta (act. 1215–1216)”. Oxford Dictionary of
National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/93691. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
o ^ Powicke 1929.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 14–15.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d Carpenter 1990, p. 13.
o ^
McGlynn 2013, p. 189.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Ridgeway 2010.
o ^ Weiler 2012, p. 1.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 1.
o ^ Mayr-Harting 2011, pp. 259–260.
o ^ Mayr-Harting 2011, p. 260.
o ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 301.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter
1990, pp. 19–21.
o ^ Aurell 2003, p. 30.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 21–22, 24–25.
o ^ Powicke 1963, p. 5.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 25.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 27.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 28–29.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 127–28.
o ^ Carpenter
1990, pp. 36–40.
o ^ McGlynn 2013, p. 216.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Hallam & Everard 2001, p. 173.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 41–42.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1990, p. 42.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1990, p. 44.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 41,
44–45.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 60.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1990, pp. 61–62.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 402.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 333–335, 382–383.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 295–296.
o ^ Jobson 2012, p. 6.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 296–297.
o ^
Carpenter 1990, p. 297.
o ^ Hallam & Everard 2001, p. 176.
o ^ Weiler 2012, p. 20.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 371–373.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 374–375.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 376, 378.
o ^ Hallam & Everard 2001, pp. 176–177.
o ^ Jump up
to:a b Carpenter 2004, p. 307.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 383.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, pp. 2–3, 383, 386
o ^ Carpenter 2004, p. 307
o ^ Jump up to:a b Clanchy 1997, p. 147.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Davis 2013, p. 71.
o ^ Davis 2013, p. 174.
o ^ Jump
up to:a b Carpenter 1996, pp. 76, 99.
o ^ Carpenter 1990, p. 3.
o ^ Carpenter 1996, pp. 26, 29, 37, 43.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Carpenter 1996, p. 105.
o ^ Davis 2013, pp. 195–197.
o ^ Jobson 2012, p. 104.
o ^ Davis 2013, p. 224.
o ^ Jobson
2012, p. 163.
o ^ Holt 1992b, pp. 510–11.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Prestwich 1997, p. 427.
o ^ “Magna Carta (1297)”. The National Archive. Retrieved 29 July 2010.
o ^ “Magna Carta (1297)”. Statutelaw.gov.uk. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ Edwards
1943.
o ^ “Confirmatio Cartarum”. britannia.com. Retrieved 30 November 2007.
o ^ Prestwich 1997, p. 434.
o ^ Cobbett et al. 1810, p. 980.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. Salisbury Cathedral. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
o ^ The Statutes at Large Passed
in the Parliaments held in Ireland from The Third Year of Edward the Second A.D. 1310 to the First Year of George the Third, A.D. 1761 Inclusive. Boulter Grierson. 1763. p. 132.
o ^ “Confirmatio Cartarum [26] October 10, 1297”. 1215.org. Retrieved
19 January 2015.
o ^ Holt 2008, p. 62.
o ^ Fritze & Robison 2002, pp. 34–35.
o ^ Prestwich 1997, pp. 547–548.
o ^ Menache 2003, pp. 253–255.
o ^ Scott 2014.
o ^ Holt 2008, pp. 44–45.
o ^ Holt 2008, pp. 45–46.
o ^ Holt 2008, p. 56.
o ^
Holt 2008, pp. 56–57.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 123.
o ^ Thompson 1948, pp. 9–10.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2003a.
o ^ “800th anniversary of Magna Carta” (PDF). Church of England General Synod. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. Royal
Family History. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Johnson, Ben. “The Origins of the Magna Carta”. Historic UK. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 132.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 133.
o ^ Hindley 1990, pp. 185–187.
o ^ Hindley 1990, pp.
185–186.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 138.
o ^ Thompson 1948, p. 146.
o ^ Warren 1990, p. 324.
o ^ Hindley 1990, p. 187.
o ^ Magna Carta, cum aliis antiquis statutis … London: Thomas Berthelet, 1531 Beale S9; STC 9271. Magna carta cvm aliis antiqvis
statvtis, qvorvm catalogvm, in fine operis reperies. London: Thomas Berthelet, 1540. Beale S12; STC 9274 Archived 12 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine. revised edition by Thomas Marshe (1556), Magna Carta et cetera antiqua statuta nunc nouiter per
diuersa exemplaria examinata et summa diligentia castigata et correcta cui adiecta est noua tabula valde necessaria.
o ^ Thompson 1948, pp. 147–149.
o ^ Brayley, Edward Wedlake. The Beauties of England and Wales, or original delineations, topographical,
historical and descriptive of each county (PDF).
o ^ T. Rodenhurst (1840). A Description of Hawkstone, the Seat of Sir R. Hill, Bart M.P.: With Brief Notices of the Antiquities of Bury Walls and of Red Castle, an Account of the Column, in Shrewsbury
and of Lord Hill’s Military Actions. Printed at the Chronicle Office, and sold by J. Watton.
o ^ Saul, Nigel (23 April 2014). “William Hardel”. Magna Carta Trust 800th Anniversary. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
o ^ “Obelisk, Hawkstone Park, Weston
Under Redcastle, Shropshire | Educational Images”. Historic England. Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 11 April 2023.
o ^ Hindley 1990, p. 183.
o ^ Pocock 1987, p. 124.
o ^ Holt 1992b, p. 9.
o ^ Eele 2013, p. 20.
o ^
Thompson 1948, pp. 216–230.
o ^ Pocock 1987, p. 154.
o ^ Wright 1919, p. 72.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Hindley 1990, pp. 188–189.
o ^ Pocock 1987, p. 300.
o ^ Greenberg 2006, p. 148.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 148.
o ^ Holt 1992b, pp. 20–21.
o ^
Turner 2003b, p. 156.
o ^ Hindley 1990, pp. 189–190.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 157.
o ^ Russell 1990, p. 41.
o ^ Hindley 1990, p. 190.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 271.
o ^ Woolwrych 2003, p. 95.
o ^ Jump up to:a b “Magna Carta: a precedent
for recent constitutional change” (PDF). Judiciary of England and Wales Speeches. 15 June 2005. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Pocock 1987, p. 127.
o ^ Kewes 2006, p. 279.
o ^ Kewes 2006, p. 226.
o ^ Danziger & Gillingham 2004, pp. 281–282.
o ^
Hill 2006, pp. 111–122.
o ^ Linebaugh 2009, p. 85.
o ^ Pocock 1987, pp. 182–228.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 165.
o ^ Pocock 1987, p. 228.
o ^ Turner 2003b, pp. 169–170.
o ^ Breay & Harrison 2015, pp. 110–111, 134.
o ^ Linebaugh 2009, pp. 113–14.
o ^
Linebaugh 2009, pp. 113–114.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2003b, pp. 67–68.
o ^ Fryde 2001, p. 207.
o ^ Goodrich, Chauncey A. “The Speeches of Lord Chatham”. Classic Persuasion.
o ^ “Lord Irvine of Lairg ‘The Spirit of Magna Carta Continues
to Resonate in Modern Law'”. Parliament of Australia. December 2002. Archived from the original on 6 November 2014. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
o ^ Brink, Robert J. (18 August 2014). “History on display: one lawyer’s musings on Magna Carta”. Massachusetts
Lawyers Weekly. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
o ^ Howard 2008, p. 28.
o ^ Hazeltine 1917, p. 194.
o ^ Hazeltine 1917, p. 195.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 210.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 211.
o ^ Hazeltine 1917, pp. 183–184.
o ^ Logal, W.A. (2000).
“Federal Habeas in the Information Age”. Minnesota Law Review. 85: 147.
o ^ Stimson 2004, p. 124.
o ^ Black 1999, p. 10.
o ^ “‘Klopfer v. North Carolina’, 386 U.S. 213 (1967)”. FindLaw. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
o ^ Did King John actually ‘sign’
Magna Carta?, BBC, 19 January 2015, retrieved 14 April 2020
o ^ Jump up to:a b Turner 2003b, pp. 199–200.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Fryde 2001, p. 1.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Simmons 1998, pp. 69–83.
o ^ Galef 1998, pp. 78–79.
o ^ Barnes 2008, p. 23.
o ^
Danziger & Gillingham 2004, p. 283.
o ^ “Home”. The Baronial Order of Magna Charta. Retrieved 19 November 2014.
o ^ Wright 1990, p. 167.
o ^ Holt 1992b, pp. 2–3.
o ^ Burdett 1810, p. 41.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c “(Magna Carta) (1297) (c. 9)”.
UK Statute Law Database. Archived from the original on 5 September 2007. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. Segamore Institute. Archived from the original on 5 November 2014. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Clark 2000.
o ^ Kennedy
1922, p. 228.
o ^ Drew 2004, pp. pxvi–pxxiii.
o ^ “So will the revolution start in Haltemprice and Howden?”. The Independent. UK. 14 June 2008. Retrieved 16 June 2008.
o ^ Green, David Allen (16 June 2014). “The myth of Magna Carta”. Financial
Times. Retrieved 21 January 2015. The sarcasm of the Master of the Rolls was plain
o ^ “The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede”. 22 February 2012. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
o ^ Holt 1992b, p. 2.
o ^ Warren 1990, p. 240.
o ^
Holt 1992b, p. 21.
o ^ “Magna Carta (25 Ed I)”. New Zealand Law online.
o ^ “Magna Carta 1297 No 29 (as at 03 September 2007), Imperial Act – New Zealand Legislation”. www.legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved 3 December 2018.
o ^ “United States Constitution
Q + A”. The Charters of Freedom. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ “Magna Carta Replica and Display”. Architect of the Capitol. Retrieved 20 November 2014.
o ^ Doward, Jamie (1 November 2014). “Magna
Carta 800 years on: recognition at last for ‘England’s greatest export'”. The Observer. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
o ^ “Celebrating 800 years of Magna Carta”. British Library. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
o ^ “Magna Carta: Law, Liberty, Legacy”.
British Library. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
o ^ Jones, Jonathan (14 May 2015). “Kings and needles: the Magna Carta gets an embroidery update”. The Guardian. Retrieved 14 May 2015.
o ^ Davies, Caroline (15 June 2015). “Magna Carta: leaders celebrate
800th anniversary of the Great Charter”. The Guardian. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
o ^ “800th Anniversary of the Magna Carta”. Google. 15 June 2015.
o ^ “Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor”. Library of Congress. 6 November 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
o ^
“Magna Carta 800”. Visit Lincoln. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
o ^ “800th Anniversary of Magna Carta 2015 UK £2 BU Coin”. Royal Mint. Retrieved 27 December 2014.
o ^ “Magna Carta 800th Anniversary 2015 UK £2 Silver Piedfort Coin | The Royal Mint”.
The Royal Mint. Archived from the original on 25 November 2015. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
o ^ “Bury St Edmunds Magna Carta 800”. Bury St Edmunds: The Bury Society. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Breay 2010, p. 37.
o ^ Breay
2010, pp. 37–38.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Hindley 1990, p. 143.
o ^ Breay 2010, pp. 38–39.
o ^ Browning 1898, p. 50.
o ^ Breay 2010, pp. 34–35.
o ^ Breay 2010, p. 34.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Breay 2010, p. 35.
o ^ Breay 2010, pp. 34–36.
o ^ Breay
2010, pp. 35–36.
o ^ Breay 2010, p. 36.
o ^ Turner 2003b, p. 65.
o ^ “Canterbury’s Magna Carta rediscovered in time for 800th anniversary”. Canterbury Christ Church University. Archived from the original on 23 January 2015. Retrieved 31 January
2015.
o ^ “Remarkable discovery says copy of Magna Carta in British Library was ‘Canterbury charter'”. kentnews. Archived from the original on 23 January 2015. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
o ^ Breay & Harrison 2015, pp. 57, 66.
o ^ Breay & Harrison
2015, pp. 66, 216–219.
o ^ Duffy, Christina. “Revealing the secrets of the burnt Magna Carta”. British Library. Retrieved 8 June 2016.
o ^ Breay 2010, pp. 36–37.
o ^ Davis 1963, p. 36.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Knight, Alec (17 April 2004). “Magna
Charta: Our Heritage and Yours”. National Society Magna Charta Dames and Barons. Archived from the original on 21 August 2004. Retrieved 2 September 2007.
o ^ Jump up to:a b “Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor Magna Carta Comes to America”. Library of
Congress. 6 November 2014.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Vincent 2012, p. 107.
o ^ “Proposed Gift of Magna Carta to America, 1941”. The National Archives. Retrieved 29 January 2022. May we give you – at least as a token of our feelings – something of no
intrinsic value whatever: a bit of parchment, more than seven hundred years old, rather the worse for wear.
o ^ “Magna Carta As Exhibit For New York World Fair”. British Pathé. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
o ^ “Magna Carta in the US, Part I: The
British Pavilion of the 1939 New York World’s Fair”. 30 April 2014.
o ^ “Magna Carta on Display Beginning 4 July” (Press release). National Constitution Center. 30 May 2007. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 2 September
2007.
o ^ “Magna Carta & Four Foundations of Freedom”. Contemporary Art Center of Virginia. 2007. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Kahn, Eve M (13 September 2009). “Copy of Magna Carta Travels to New York in Style”. The New York Times. Retrieved
4 January 2015.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. Lincoln Castle. 12 February 2015. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. Lincoln Cathedral. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
o ^ Salisbury Cathedral (2013). “The Salisbury Connection”. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
o ^
Jump up to:a b Vincent 2012, p. 104.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Salisbury Cathedral (2013). “The Document”. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
o ^ “Award for cathedral Magna Carta”. BBC News Online. 4 August 2009. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
o ^ Salisbury Cathedral
(2013). “Visiting Magna Carta”. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Vincent 2012, p. 106.
o ^ Jump up to:a b “Magna Carta pulls in the crowds”. Bodleian Libraries. University of Oxford. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ “Magna Carta at
Hereford Cathedral”. BBC. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ “The Magna Carta”. Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. 5 April 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
o ^ “Magna Carta, 1225”. British Library. Retrieved 22 November 2014.
o ^ Campbell, Sophie
(16 September 2014). “Magna Carta: On the trail of the Great Charter”. Telegraph. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Lewis 1987, p. 494.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. The National Archives. Retrieved 19 January
2015.
o ^ Moss, Richard. “Society of Antiquaries to restore and display Magna Carta for 800th anniversary”. Culture 24. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ “Harry Evans “Bad King John and the Australian Constitution: Commemorating the 700th Anniversary
of the 1297 Issue of Magna Carta*””. Papers on Parliament No. 31. Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Metherell, Mark (4 January 2006). “Rare Magna Carta copy not such a big deal after all”. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 4
November 2014.
o ^ Barron, James (25 September 2007). “Magna Carta is going on the auction block”. The New York Times. Retrieved 19 December 2007.
o ^ “Magna Carta copy fetches $24m”. Sydney Morning Herald. 19 December 2007. Retrieved 19 December
2007.
o ^ Edgers, Geoff (31 October 2014). “Two Magna Cartas in D.C.” The Washington Post. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
o ^ Vincent 2015, p. 160.
o ^ Hossack, James (19 December 2007). “Magna Carta Sold at Auction for $21.3 Million”. The Sydney
Morning Herald. Retrieved 14 June 2015.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Harris, Carolyn. “Where is Magna Carta Today?”. Magna Carta 2015 Canada. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ “Magna Carta”. National Archives. 1297. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ Jump up to:a
b “Magna Carta edition found in Sandwich archive scrapbook”. BBC. 8 February 2015. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ “Faversham gets ready to celebrate its Magna Carta artefact”. Faversham Times. 17 September 2014. Archived from the original on 12 February
2015. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ “New City of London Heritage Gallery to open at the Guildhall”. Museums and Heritage Advisor. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
o ^ “About us”. Sandwich Guildhall Museum. Retrieved 13 September 2023.
o ^ Press Association
(8 February 2015). “£10m Magna Carta found in council archives. Expert says discovery of 1300 edition of historic document raises hopes that there are more than the 24 copies currently known about in existence”. The Guardian.
o ^ Jump up to:a b
c d e Breay 2010, p. 28.
o ^ Poole 1993, pp. 16–17.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Breay 2010, p. 29.
o ^ Gordon v. Justice Court, 12 Cal. 3d 323 (1974).
o ^ Jump up to:a b Huscroft 2005, p. 97.
o ^ Poole 1993, pp. 29–30.
o ^ Poole 1993, p. 29.
o ^
Jump up to:a b c Breay 2010, p. 32.
o ^ Poole 1993, pp. 353, 474.
o ^ Hillaby 2013, p. 23.
o ^ Huscroft 2005, p. 190.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Huscroft 2005, p. 189.
o ^ Turner 2009, p. 121.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c Breay 2010, pp. 49–54.
o ^
Sharples, Barry. “Magna Carta Liberatum (The Great Charter of Liberties) The First Great Charter of King Edward The First Granted October 12th 1297”. Retrieved 13 November 2014.
o ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
aa ab ac ad ae af ag “Magna Carta (1297)”. Uk Government. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
o ^ Jump up to:a b Madison, P. A. (2 August 2010). “Historical Analysis of the first of the 14th Amendment’s First Section”. The Federalist Blog. Archived from
the original on 18 November 2019. Retrieved 19 January 2013. The words “We will sell to no man” were intended to abolish the fines demanded by King John in order to obtain justice. “Will not deny” referred to the stopping of suits and the denial of
writs. “Delay to any man” meant the delays caused either by the counter-fines of defendants, or by the prerogative of the King.
o ^ “The 1215 Magna Carta: Clause 52”. The Magna Carta Project. University of East Anglia. Retrieved 22 July 2021.
o ^
Jump up to:a b Hindley 1990, p. 201.
• Aurell, Martin (2003). L’Empire de Plantagenêt, 1154–1224 (in French). Paris: Tempus. ISBN 978-2262022822.
• Barnes, Thomas Garden (2008). Shaping the Common Law: From Glanvill to Hale, 1188–1688. Stanford
University Press. ISBN 978-0804779593.
• Black, Charles (1999). A New Birth of Freedom: Human Rights, Named and Unnamed. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300077346.
• Blick, Andrew (2015). Beyond Magna Carta: A Constitution for
the United Kingdom. Oxford: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-84946-309-6.
• Breay, Claire (2010). Magna Carta: Manuscripts and Myths. London: The British Library. ISBN 978-0712358330.
• Breay, Claire; Harrison, Julian, eds. (2015). Magna Carta: Law, Liberty,
Legacy. London: The British Library. ISBN 978-0712357647.
• Browning, Charles Henry (1898). “The Magna Charta Described”. The Magna Charta Barons and Their American Descendants with the Pedigrees of the Founders of the Order of Runnemede Deduced
from the Sureties for the Enforcement of the Statutes of the Magna Charta of King John. Philadelphia. OCLC 9378577.
• Burdett, Francis (1810). Sir Francis Burdett to His Constituents. R. Bradshaw.
• Carpenter, David A. (1990). The Minority of
Henry III. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0413623607.
• Carpenter, David (1996). The Reign of Henry III. London: Hambledon Press. ISBN 978-1852851378.
• Carpenter, David A. (2004). Struggle for Mastery: The
Penguin History of Britain 1066–1284. London: Penguin. ISBN 978-0140148244.
• Clanchy, Michael T. (1997). Early Medieval England. The Folio Society.
• Clark, David (2000). “The Icon of Liberty: The Status and Role of Magna Carta in Australian
and New Zealand Law”. Melbourne University Law Review. 24 (3).
• Cobbett, William; Howell, Thomas Bayly; Howell, Th.J.; Jardine, William (1810). Cobbett’s Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason and Other Crimes and
Misdemeanors from the Earliest Period to the Present Time. Bagshaw.
• Crouch, David (1996). William Marshal: Court, Career and Chivalry in the Angevin Empire 1147–1219. Longman. ISBN 978-0582037861.
• Danziger, Danny; Gillingham, John (2004).
1215: The Year of Magna Carta. Hodder Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0340824757.
• Davis, G.R.C. (1963). Magna Carta. The British Library Publishing Division. ISBN 978-0712300148.
• Davis, John Paul (2013). The Gothic King: A Biography of Henry III. London:
Peter Owen. ISBN 978-0720614800.
• Drew, Katherine F. (2004). Magna Carta. Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0313325908.
• Edwards, J.G. (1943). “Confirmatio Cartarum and Baronial Grievances in 1297”. The English Historical Review. 58 (231): 273–300.
doi:10.1093/ehr/lviii.ccxxxi.273. JSTOR 554340.
• Eele, Caroline (2013). Perceptions of Magna Carta: Why has it been seen as significant? (PDF) (Thesis). 2014 Magna Carta 2015 Committee. Retrieved 18 November 2014.
• Fryde, Natalie (2001). Why
Magna Carta? Angevin England Revisited. Munster, Germany: LiT. ISBN 978-3825856571.
• Fritze, Ronald; Robison, William (2002). Historical Dictionary of Late Medieval England 1272–1485. Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0313291241.
• Galef, David (1998).
Second Thoughts: Focus on Rereading. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0814326473.
• Goodman, Ellen (1995). The Origins of the Western Legal Tradition: From Thales to the Tudors. Federation Press. ISBN 978-1862871816.
• Greenberg,
Janelle (2006). The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St Edward’s ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521024884.
• Hallam, Elizabeth M.; Everard, Judith A. (2001). Capetian France,
987–1328 (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman. ISBN 978-0582404281.
• Hazeltine, H.D. (1917). “The Influence of Magna Carta on American Constitutional Development”. In Malden, Henry Elliot (ed.). Magna Carta commemoration essays. BiblioBazaar. ISBN 978-1116447477.
• Hewit,
H.J. (1929). Mediaeval Cheshire. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
• Hill, Christopher (2006). Winstanley ‘The Law of Freedom’ and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521031608.
• Hillaby, Caroline (2013). The Palgrave
Dictionary of Medieval Anglo-Jewish History. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1137308153.
• Hindley, Geoffrey (1990). The Book of Magna Carta. London: Constable. ISBN 978-0094682405.
• Holt, James C. (1992a). The Northerners: A Study in the Reign
of King John. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198203094.
• Holt, James C. (1992b). Magna Carta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521277785.
• Holt, James C. (2015). Magna Carta (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316144596. ISBN 978-1107093164.
• Holt, James C. (2008) [1993]. The Ancient Constitution in Medieval England (PDF). Liberty Fund. ISBN 978-0865977099.
• Howard, A.E. Dick (2008). “Magna Carta Comes To America”. Fourscore.
58 (4).
• Huscroft, Richard (2005). Ruling England, 1042–1217. Harlow, UK: Pearson. ISBN 978-0582848825.
• Jobson, Adrian (2012). The First English Revolution: Simon de Montfort, Henry III and the Barons’ War. London: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1847252265.
• Kennedy,
William Paul McClure (1922). The Constitution of Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kewes, Paulina (2006). The Uses of History in Early Modern England. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0873282192.
• Lewis, Suzanne (1987).
The Art of Matthew Paris in the Chronica Majora. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520049819.
• Linebaugh, Peter (2009). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520260009.
• Mayr-Harting,
Henry (2011). Religion, Politics and Society in Britain, 1066–1272. Harlow, UK: Longman. ISBN 978-0582414136.
• McGlynn, Sean (2013). Blood Cries Afar: The Forgotten Invasion of England, 1216. London: Spellmount. ISBN 978-0752488318.
• Menache,
Sophia (2003). Clement V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521521987.
• Pocock, J.G.A. (1987). The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 978-0521316439.
• Pollard, Albert Frederick (1912). The history of England; a study in political evolution. H. Holt.
• Poole, Austin Lane (1993) [1951]. From Domesday Book to Magna Carta 1087–1216 (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
• Powicke, F.M. (1929). “The Bull ‘Miramur Plurimum’ and a Letter to Archbishop Stephen Langton, 5 September 1215”. English Historical Review. 44: 87–93. doi:10.1093/ehr/xliv.clxxiii.87.
• Powicke, Frederick Maurice (1963). The Thirteenth
Century 1216–1307. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0198217084.
• Prestwich, Michael (1997). Edward I. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300071573.
• Ridgeway, H. W. (2010) [2004]. “Henry III (1207–1272)”. Oxford Dictionary
of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/12950. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
• Rothwell, Harry (1975). English Historical Documents 1189–1327. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode. ISBN
978-0413233004.
• Russell, Conrad (1990). Unrevolutionary England, 1603–1642. Continnuum-3PL. ISBN 978-1852850258.
• Scott, Robert McNair (2014). Robert The Bruce: King Of Scots. Canongate Books. ISBN 978-1847677464.
• Simmons, Clare A. (1998).
“Absent Presence: The Romantic-Era Magna Charta and the English Constitution”. In Shippey, Richard; Utz, Tom (eds.). Medievalism in the Modern World. Essays in Honour of Leslie J. Workman. Brepols Publishers.
• Stimson, Frederick Jessup (2004).
The Law Of The Federal And State Constitutions Of The United States. Lawbook Exchange Ltd. ISBN 978-1584773696.
• Tatton-Brown, Tim (July 2015). “Magna Carta at 800: Uncovering its Landscape Archaeology”. Current Archaeology (304): 34–37.
• Thompson,
Faith (1948). Magna Carta – Its Role In The Making Of The English Constitution 1300–1629. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-1299948686.
• Turner, Ralph V. (2003a). “The Meaning of Magna Carta since 1215”. History Today. 53 (9).
• Turner,
Ralph (2003b). Magna Carta: Through the Ages. Routledge. ISBN 978-0582438262.
• Turner, Ralph (2009). King John: England’s Evil King?. Stroud, UK: History Press. ISBN 978-0752448503.
• Vincent, Nicholas (2012). Magna Carta: A Very Short Introduction.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199582877.
• Vincent, Nicholas (2015). “From World War to World Heritage: Magna Carta in the Twentieth Century”. In Vincent, Nicholas (ed.). Magna Carta: The Foundation of Freedom, 1215–2015. London: Third
Millennium Publishing. pp. 154–169. ISBN 978-1908990488.
• Warren, W. Lewis (1990). King John. London: Methuen. ISBN 978-0413455208.
• Weiler, Björn K.U. (2012). Henry III of England and the Staufen Empire, 1216–1272. Paris: Royal Historical Society:
Boydell Press. ISBN 978-0861933198.
• White, Albert Beebe (1915). “The Name Magna Carta”. The English Historical Review. XXX (CXIX): 472–475. doi:10.1093/ehr/XXX.CXIX.472.
• White, Albert Beebe (1917). “Note on the Name Magna Carta”. The English
Historical Review. XXXII (CXXVIII): 545–555. doi:10.1093/ehr/XXXII.CXXVIII.554.
• Woolwrych, Austin Herbert (2003). Smith, David Lee (ed.). Cromwell and Interregnum: The Essential Readings. Wiley-Blackwell. IS Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/cq-biker/16677542612/’]