A light sail or magnetic sail powered by a massive laser or particle accelerator in the home star system could potentially reach even greater speeds than rocket- or pulse
propulsion methods, because it would not need to carry its own reaction mass and therefore would only need to accelerate the craft’s payload.
Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion powered by a portable power-source, say a nuclear reactor, producing only small accelerations, would take centuries to reach for
example 15% of the velocity of light, thus unsuitable for interstellar flight during a single human lifetime.
Robert L. Forward proposed a means for decelerating an interstellar craft with a light sail of 100 kilometers in the destination star system without requiring a laser array
to be present in that system.
 Most interstellar travel concepts require a developed space logistics system capable of moving millions of tonnes to a construction / operating location, and most would
require gigawatt-scale power for construction or power (such as Star Wisp– or Light Sail–type concepts).
 Yet the idea is attractive because the fuel would be collected en route (commensurate with the concept of energy harvesting), so the craft could theoretically
accelerate to near the speed of light.
 Whether antimatter propulsion could lead to the higher speeds (>90% that of light) at which relativistic time dilation would become more noticeable, thus making time
pass at a slower rate for the travelers as perceived by an outside observer, is doubtful owing to the large quantity of antimatter that would be required.
In theory, a large number of stages could push a vehicle arbitrarily close to the speed of light.
• Area of the Lightsail, about • Velocity up to (12.5% c) Pre-accelerated fuel Achieving start-stop interstellar trip times of less than a human lifetime require mass-ratios
of between 1,000 and 1,000,000, even for the nearer stars.
Proposed methods Slow, uncrewed probes Main article: Interstellar probe “Slow” interstellar missions (still fast by other standards) based on current and near-future
propulsion technologies are associated with trip times starting from about several decades to thousands of years.
Such vehicles probably have the potential to power solar system exploration with reasonable trip times within the current century.
 A magnetic sail could also decelerate at its destination without depending on carried fuel or a driving beam in the destination system, by interacting with the plasma
found in the solar wind of the destination star and the interstellar medium.
This propulsion system contains the prospect of very high specific impulse (space travel’s equivalent of fuel economy) and high specific power.
If this were performed with an acceleration similar to that experienced at the Earth’s surface, it would have the added advantage of producing artificial “gravity” for the
Very high specific power, the ratio of thrust to total vehicle mass, is required to reach interstellar targets within sub-century time-frames.
 If energy resources and efficient production methods are found to make antimatter in the quantities required and store it safely, it would be theoretically possible
to reach speeds of several tens of percent that of light.
Because of the vastness of these distances, non-generational interstellar travel based on known physics would need to occur at a high percentage of the speed of light; even
so, travel times would be long, at least decades and perhaps millennia or longer.
 As of 2022, five uncrewed spacecraft, all launched and operated by the United States, have achieved the escape velocity required to leave the Solar System as part of missions
to explore parts of the outer system.
Clocks aboard an interstellar ship would run slower than Earth clocks, so if a ship’s engines were capable of continuously generating around 1 g of acceleration (which is
comfortable for humans), the ship could reach almost anywhere in the galaxy and return to Earth within 40 years ship-time (see diagram).
The concept of using a magnetic sail to decelerate the spacecraft as it approaches its destination has been discussed as an alternative to using propellant, this would allow
the ship to travel near the maximum theoretical velocity.
Thus, for interstellar rocket concepts of all technologies, a key engineering problem (seldom explicitly discussed) is limiting the heat transfer from the exhaust stream back
into the vehicle.
Because of their low-thrust propulsion, they would be limited to off-planet, deep-space operation.
 Rockets with an external energy source Rockets deriving their power from external sources, such as a laser, could replace their internal energy source with an energy
collector, potentially reducing the mass of the ship greatly and allowing much higher travel speeds.
 By taking along no crew, the cost and complexity of the mission is significantly reduced, as is the mass that needs to be accelerated, although technology lifetime is
still a significant issue next to obtaining a reasonable speed of travel.
Another issue to be considered, would be the g-forces imparted to a rapidly accelerated spacecraft, cargo, and passengers inside (see Inertia negation).
 Non-rocket concepts A problem with all traditional rocket propulsion methods is that the spacecraft would need to carry its fuel with it, thus making it very massive,
in accordance with the rocket equation.
Such a system could grow organically if space-based solar power became a significant component of Earth’s energy mix.
 Later studies indicate that the top cruise velocity that can theoretically be achieved by a Teller-Ulam thermonuclear unit powered Orion starship, assuming no fuel is
saved for slowing back down, is about 8% to 10% of the speed of light (0.08-0.1c).
Since particles traveling at such speeds acquire more mass, it is believed that this mass change could create acceleration.
Instead, assuming that a civilization is still on an increasing curve of propulsion system velocity and not yet having reached the limit, the resources should be invested
in designing a better propulsion system.
According to Burns, the spacecraft could theoretically reach 99% the speed of light.
Kaku also notes that a large number of nanoprobes would need to be sent due to the vulnerability of very small probes to be easily deflected by magnetic fields, micrometeorites
and other dangers to ensure the chances that at least one nanoprobe will survive the journey and reach the destination.
The principle of external nuclear pulse propulsion to maximize survivable power has remained common among serious concepts for interstellar flight without external power beaming
and for very high-performance interplanetary flight.
At higher speeds, the time on board will run even slower, so the astronaut could travel to the center of the Milky Way (30,000 light years from Earth) and back in 40 years
As part of this, distances between objects in the direction of the ship’s motion will gradually contract until the ship begins to decelerate, at which time an onboard observer’s
experience of the gravitational field will be reversed.
This treaty would, therefore, need to be renegotiated, although a project on the scale of an interstellar mission using currently foreseeable technology would probably require
international cooperation on at least the scale of the International Space Station.
The universe would appear contracted along the direction of travel to half the size it had when the ship was at rest; the distance between that star and the Sun would seem
to be 16 light years as measured by the astronaut.
 A major issue with traveling at extremely high speeds is that due to the requisite high relative speeds and large kinetic energies, collisions with interstellar dust
could cause considerable damage to the craft.
Another fairly detailed vehicle system, “Discovery II”, designed and optimized for crewed Solar System exploration, based on the reaction but using hydrogen as reaction mass,
has been described by a team from NASA’s Glenn Research Center.
Several propulsion concepts have been proposed that might be eventually developed to accomplish this (see Propulsion below), but none of them are ready for near-term (few
decades) developments at acceptable cost.
 With this proposal, this interstellar ship would, theoretically, be able to reach 10 percent the speed of light.
By contrast, ion engines have low force, but the top speed in principle is limited only by the electrical power available on the spacecraft and on the gas ions being accelerated.
Constant acceleration Regardless of how it is achieved, a propulsion system that could produce acceleration continuously from departure to arrival would be the fastest
method of travel.
For example, a spaceship could travel to a star 32 light-years away, initially accelerating at a constant 1.03g for 1.32 years (ship time), then stopping its engines and coasting
for the next 17.3 years (ship time) at a constant speed, then decelerating again for 1.32 ship-years, and coming to a stop at the destination.
However, they will not approach another star for hundreds of thousands of years, long after they have ceased to operate (though in theory the Voyager Golden Record would be
playable in the highly unlikely event that the spacecraft is retrieved by an extraterrestrial civilization).
Based on work in the late 1950s to the early 1960s, it has been technically possible to build spaceships with nuclear pulse propulsion engines, i.e.
Whereas the distance between any two planets in the Solar System is less than 30 astronomical units (AU), stars are typically separated by hundreds of thousands of AU, causing
these distances to typically be expressed instead in light-years.
Even assuming shielding was provided to protect the payload (and passengers on a crewed vehicle), some of the energy would inevitably heat the vehicle, and may thereby prove
a limiting factor if useful accelerations are to be achieved.
 From the perspective of a planetary observer, the ship will appear to accelerate steadily at first, but then more gradually as it approaches the speed of light (which
it cannot exceed).
 The velocity for a crewed round trip of a few decades to even the nearest star is several thousand times greater than those of present space vehicles.
 An additional consideration is that due the non-homogeneous distribution of interstellar matter around the Sun, these risks would vary between different trajectories.
The speeds required for interstellar travel in a human lifetime far exceed what current methods of space travel can provide.
First, in the annihilation of antimatter, much of the energy is lost as high-energy gamma radiation, and especially also as neutrinos, so that only about 40% of would actually
be available if the antimatter were simply allowed to annihilate into radiations thermally.
Prime targets for interstellar travel There are 59 known stellar systems within 40 light years of the Sun, containing 81 visible stars.
 Fast, uncrewed probes Main article: Interstellar probe Nanoprobes Near-lightspeed nano spacecraft might be possible within the near future built on existing
microchip technology with a newly developed nanoscale thruster.
Second, heat transfer from the exhaust to the vehicle seems likely to transfer enormous wasted energy into the ship (e.g.
If deceleration on arrival is desired and cannot be achieved by any means other than the engines of the ship, then the lower bound for the required energy is doubled to .
This means that due to the term in the kinetic energy formula, millions of times as much energy is required.
When the ship reaches its destination, if it were to exchange a message with its origin planet, it would find that less time had elapsed on board than had elapsed for the
planetary observer, due to time dilation and length contraction.
But the speed according to Earth clocks will always be less than 1 light year per Earth year, so, when back home, the astronaut will find that more than 60 thousand years
will have passed on Earth.
Accelerating one ton to one-tenth of the speed of light requires at least 450 petajoules or125 terawatt-hours (world energy consumption 2008 was 143,851 terawatt-hours),
without factoring in efficiency of the propulsion mechanism.
 As a near-term solution, small, laser-propelled interstellar probes, based on current CubeSat technology were proposed in the context of Project Dragonfly.
Nuclear fusion rockets Fusion rocket starships, powered by nuclear fusion reactions, should conceivably be able to reach speeds of the order of 10% of that of light,
based on energy considerations alone.
Interstellar travel is expected to prove much more difficult than interplanetary spaceflight due to the vast difference in the scale of the involved distances.
 Fast, crewed missions If a spaceship could average 10 percent of light speed (and decelerate at the destination, for human crewed missions), this would be enough
to reach Proxima Centauri in forty years.
 Even so, the energy available for propulsion would be substantially higher than the ~1% of yield of nuclear fusion, the next-best rival candidate.
 The ship will be close to the speed of light after about a year of accelerating and remain at that speed until it brakes for the end of the journey.
Thus, although these concepts seem to offer the best (nearest-term) prospects for travel to the nearest stars within a (long) human lifetime, they still involve massive technological
and engineering difficulties, which may turn out to be intractable for decades or centuries.
Even with a hypothetically perfectly efficient propulsion system, the kinetic energy corresponding to those speeds is enormous by today’s standards of energy development.
[‘Mauldin, John H. (May 1992). Prospects for interstellar travel. Published for the American Astronautical Society by Univelt. Interstellar travel.
2. ^ “Interstellar Travel”. www.bis-space.com. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved
16 June 2017.
3. ^ Crawford, I. A. (2009). “The Astronomical, Astrobiological and Planetary Science Case for Interstellar Spaceflight”. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 62: 415–421. arXiv:1008.4893. Bibcode:2009JBIS…62..415C.
Conclusion of the 2016 Tennessee Valley Interstellar Workshop Space Solar Power Working Track run by Peter Garretson & Robert Kennedy.
5. ^ Howell, Elizabeth (19 January 2022). “Voyager 1: Earth’s farthest spacecraft”. Space.com. Archived from
the original on 22 February 2022. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
6. ^ “A Look at the Scaling”. nasa.gov. NASA Glenn Research Center. 11 March 2015. Archived from the original on 8 July 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2013.
7. ^ Millis, Marc G. (2011). “Energy,
incessant obsolescence, and the first interstellar missions”. arXiv:1101.1066 [physics.gen-ph].
8. ^ Zirnstein, E.J (2013). “Simulating the Compton-Getting Effect for Hydrogen Flux Measurements: Implications for IBEX-Hi and -Lo Observations”. Astrophysical
Journal. 778 (2): 112–127. Bibcode:2013ApJ…778..112Z. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/778/2/112.
9. ^ Badescu, Viorel; Zacny, Kris (28 April 2018). Outer Solar System : prospective energy and material resources. Cham, Switzerland. ISBN 9783319738451. OCLC
10. ^ Jump up to:a b c Crawford, I. A. (2011). “Project Icarus: A review of local interstellar medium properties of relevance for space missions to the nearest stars”. Acta Astronautica. 68 (7–8): 691–699. arXiv:1010.4823. Bibcode:2011AcAau..68..691C.
doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.10.016. S2CID 101553.
11. ^ Westover, Shayne (27 March 2012). Active Radiation Shielding Utilizing High Temperature Superconductors (PDF). NIAC Symposium.
12. ^ Garrett, Henry (30 July 2012). There and Back Again:
A Layman’s Guide to Ultra-Reliability for Interstellar Missions (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 May 2014.
13. ^ Gibson, Dirk C. (2015). Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Space Dangers: Outer Space Perils, Rocket Risks and the
Health Consequences of the Space Environment. Bentham Science Publishers. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-60805-991-1.
14. ^ Jump up to:a b Forward, Robert L. (1996). “Ad Astra!”. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 49 (1): 23–32. Bibcode:1996JBIS…49…23F.
Kennedy, Andrew (July 2006). “Interstellar Travel: The Wait Calculation and the Incentive Trap of Progress”. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 59 (7): 239–246. Bibcode:2006JBIS…59..239K. Archived from the original on 27 September 2018.
Retrieved 4 September 2012.
16. ^ “Planet eps Eridani b”. exoplanet.eu. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
17. ^ “Astronomers Have Discovered The Closest Potentially Habitable Planet”. Yahoo! News. 18 December
2015. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
18. ^ “Three Planets in Habitable Zone of Nearby Star”. European Southern Observatory. 25 June 2013. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 25 June 2013.
Croswell, Ken (3 December 2012). “ScienceShot: Older Vega Mature Enough to Nurture Life”. Science. doi:10.1126/article.26684 (inactive 6 May 2023). Archived from the original on 4 December 2012.
20. ^ Voyager. Louisiana State University: ERIC Clearing
House. 1977. p. 12. Retrieved 26 October 2015.
21. ^ Jump up to:a b Gilster, Paul (5 September 2014). “Project Dragonfly: The case for small, laser-propelled, distributed probes”. Centauri Dreams. Archived from the original on 2 July 2018. Retrieved
12 June 2015.
22. ^ Nogrady, Bianca (4 October 2016). “The myths and reality about interstellar travel”. BBC Future. Archived from the original on 12 July 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
23. ^ Wilson, Daniel H. (8 July 2009). “Near-lightspeed nano
spacecraft might be close”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 15 April 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
24. ^ Kaku, Michio (2008). Physics of the Impossible. Anchor Books.
25. ^ Hein, Andreas (17 April 2012). “How Will Humans Fly to the
Stars?”. Centauri Dreams. Archived from the original on 20 January 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2013.
26. ^ Hein, A. M.; et al. (2012). “World Ships: Architectures & Feasibility Revisited”. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 65: 119–133.
Bibcode:2012JBIS…65..119H. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
27. ^ Jump up to:a b Hein, A.M.; Smith, C.; Marin, F.; Staats, K. (2020). “World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale”. Acta Futura. 12: 75–104.
arXiv:2005.04100. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3747333. S2CID 218571111. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 1 June 2020.
28. ^ Bond, A.; Martin, A.R. (1984). “World Ships – An Assessment of the Engineering Feasibility”. Journal of the British
Interplanetary Society. 37: 254–266. Bibcode:1984JBIS…37..254B.
29. ^ Frisbee, R.H. (2009). Limits of Interstellar Flight Technology in Frontiers of Propulsion Science. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics.
30. ^ Hein, Andreas M. “Project
Hyperion: The Hollow Asteroid Starship – Dissemination of an Idea”. Icarus Interstellar. Archived from the original on 10 April 2013. Retrieved 12 April 2013.
31. ^ “Various articles on hibernation”. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.
59: 81–144. 2006.
32. ^ Crowl, A.; Hunt, J.; Hein, A.M. (2012). “Embryo Space Colonisation to Overcome the Interstellar Time Distance Bottleneck”. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 65: 283–285. Bibcode:2012JBIS…65..283C. Archived
from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2013.
33. ^ Gilster, Paul (12 February 2012). “‘Island-Hopping’ to the Stars”. Centauri Dreams. Archived from the original on 18 November 2021. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
34. ^ Jump up to:a
b c d e f Crawford, I. A. (1990). “Interstellar Travel: A Review for Astronomers”. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 31: 377–400. Bibcode:1990QJRAS..31..377C.
35. ^ Parkinson, Bradford W.; Spilker, James J. Jr.; Axelrad, Penina;
Enge, Per (2014). 22.214.171.124Time Dilation. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. ISBN 978-1-56347-106-3.
36. ^ “Clock paradox III” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2014. Taylor, Edwin F.; Wheeler,
John Archibald (1966). “Chapter 1 Exercise 51”. Spacetime Physics. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. pp. 97–98. ISBN 978-0-7167-0336-5.
37. ^ Crowell, Benjamin (2010). “4 (Force and motion)”. Light and Matter. Benjamin Crowell. Archived from the original
on 26 September 2022. Retrieved 6 May 2023.
38. ^ Yagasaki, Kazuyuki (2008). “Invariant Manifolds And Control Of Hyperbolic Trajectories On Infinite- Or Finite-Time Intervals”. Dynamical Systems. 23 (3): 309–331. doi:10.1080/14689360802263571. S2CID
39. ^ Orth, C. D. (16 May 2003). VISTA – A Vehicle for Interplanetary Space Transport Application Powered by Inertial Confinement Fusion (PDF) (Report). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 December
2016. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
40. ^ Clarke, Arthur C. (1951). The Exploration of Space. New York: Harper.
41. ^ Dawn Of A New Era: The Revolutionary Ion Engine That Took Spacecraft To Ceres, 10 March 2015, archived from the original on 13 March
2015, retrieved 13 March 2015
42. ^ Project Daedalus: The Propulsion System Part 1; Theoretical considerations and calculations. 2. REVIEW OF ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS, archived from the original on 28 June 2013
43. ^ General Dynamics Corp.
(January 1964). “Nuclear Pulse Vehicle Study Condensed Summary Report (General Dynamics Corp.)” (PDF). U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 May 2010. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
Freeman J. Dyson (October 1968). “Interstellar Transport”. Physics Today. 21 (10): 41. Bibcode:1968PhT….21j..41D. doi:10.1063/1.3034534.
45. ^ Cosmos by Carl Sagan
46. ^ Lenard, Roger X.; Andrews, Dana G. (June 2007). “Use of Mini-Mag Orion
and superconducting coils for near-term interstellar transportation” (PDF). Acta Astronautica. 61 (1–6): 450–458. Bibcode:2007AcAau..61..450L. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.052. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 June 2014. Retrieved 24 November
47. ^ Winterberg, Friedwardt (2010). The Release of Thermonuclear Energy by Inertial Confinement. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-4295-91-8.
48. ^ Jump up to:a b D.F. Spencer; L.D. Jaffe (1963). “Feasibility of Interstellar Travel”. Astronautica
Acta. 9: 49–58. Archived from the original on 4 December 2017.
49. ^ PDF C. R. Williams et al., ‘Realizing “2001: A Space Odyssey”: Piloted Spherical Torus Nuclear Fusion Propulsion’, 2001, 52 pages, NASA Glenn Research Center
50. ^ “Storing
antimatter – CERN”. home.web.cern.ch. Archived from the original on 28 August 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2015.
51. ^ “ALPHA Stores Antimatter Atoms Over a Quarter of an Hour – and Still Counting – Berkeley Lab”. 5 June 2011. Archived from the original
on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2015.
52. ^ Rouaud, Mathieu (2020). Interstellar travel and antimatter (PDF). ISBN 9782954930930. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 10 September 2021.
53. ^ Winterberg, F.
(21 August 2012). “Matter–antimatter gigaelectron volt gamma ray laser rocket propulsion”. Acta Astronautica. 81 (1): 34–39. Bibcode:2012AcAau..81…34W. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.07.001.
54. ^ Landis, Geoffrey A. (29 August 1994). Laser-powered
Interstellar Probe. Conference on Practical Robotic Interstellar Flight. NY University, New York, NY. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013.
55. ^ Lenard, Roger X.; Andrews, Dana G. (June 2007). “Use of Mini-Mag Orion and superconducting
coils for near-term interstellar transportation” (PDF). Acta Astronautica. 61 (1–6): 450–458. Bibcode:2007AcAau..61..450L. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.052. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 June 2014. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
56. ^ A.
Bolonkin (2005). Non Rocket Space Launch and Flight. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-08-044731-5
57. ^ “NASA Team Claims ‘Impossible’ Space Engine Works—Get the Facts”. National Geographic News. 21 November 2016. Archived from the original on 12 November
2019. Retrieved 12 November 2019.
58. ^ “Roger SHAWYER — EM Space Drive — Articles & Patent”. rexresearch.com. Archived from the original on 14 September 2019. Retrieved 12 November 2019.
59. ^ McRae, Mike (24 May 2018). “The Latest Test on
The ‘Impossible’ EM Drive Concludes It Doesn’t Work”. ScienceAlert. Archived from the original on 12 November 2019. Retrieved 12 November 2019.
60. ^ Starr, Michelle (15 October 2019). “NASA Engineer Claims ‘Helical Engine’ Concept Could Reach
99% The Speed of Light Without Propellant”. ScienceAlert. Archived from the original on 30 November 2019. Retrieved 12 November 2019.
61. ^ Forward, R.L. (1984). “Roundtrip Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Pushed Lightsails”. J Spacecraft. 21 (2):
187–195. Bibcode:1984JSpRo..21..187F. doi:10.2514/3.8632.
62. ^ “Alpha Centauri: Our First Target for Interstellar Probes” – via go.galegroup.com.
63. ^ Delbert, Caroline (9 December 2020). “The Radical Spacecraft That Could Send Humans to a Habitable
Exoplanet”. Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 11 December 2020. Retrieved 12 December 2020.
64. ^ Andrews, Dana G.; Zubrin, Robert M. (1990). “Magnetic Sails and Interstellar Travel” (PDF). Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.
43: 265–272. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 October 2014. Retrieved 8 October 2014.
65. ^ Zubrin, Robert; Martin, Andrew (11 August 1999). “NIAC Study of the Magnetic Sail” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 May 2015. Retrieved
8 October 2014.
66. ^ Landis, Geoffrey A. (2003). “The Ultimate Exploration: A Review of Propulsion Concepts for Interstellar Flight”. In Yoji Kondo; Frederick Bruhweiler; John H. Moore, Charles Sheffield (eds.). Interstellar Travel and Multi-Generation
Space Ships. Apogee Books. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-896522-99-9.
67. ^ Heller, René; Hippke, Michael; Kervella, Pierre (2017). “Optimized trajectories to the nearest stars using lightweight high-velocity photon sails”. The Astronomical Journal. 154 (3):
115. arXiv:1704.03871. Bibcode:2017AJ….154..115H. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa813f. S2CID 119070263.
68. ^ Roger X. Lenard; Ronald J. Lipinski (2000). “Interstellar rendezvous missions employing fission propulsion systems”. AIP Conference Proceedings.
504: 1544–1555. Bibcode:2000AIPC..504.1544L. doi:10.1063/1.1290979.
69. ^ Mcrae, Mike (6 December 2022). “‘Dynamic Soaring’ Trick Could Speed Spacecraft Across Interstellar Space”. ScienceAlert. Archived from the original on 6 December 2022. Retrieved
6 December 2022.
70. ^ Larrouturou, Mathias N.; Higgns, Andrew J.; Greason, Jeffrey K. (28 November 2022). “Dynamic soaring as a means to exceed the solar wind speed”. Frontiers in Space Technologies. 3. arXiv:2211.14643. Bibcode:2022FrST….317442L.
71. ^ “Michio Kaku foretells humanity’s extraordinary future”. NBC News. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021. We’re going to have the Human Connectome Project map the human
brain before the end of this century, I think. We’re going to put the connectome on a laser beam and shoot it to the moon. In one second, our consciousness is on the moon. In 20 minutes we’re on Mars, eight hours we’re on Pluto, in four years our
consciousness has reached the nearest star.
72. ^ Jump up to:a b Crawford, Ian A. (1995). “Some thoughts on the implications of faster-than-light interstellar space travel”. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 36: 205–218. Bibcode:1995QJRAS..36..205C.
Feinberg, G. (1967). “Possibility of faster-than-light particles”. Physical Review. 159 (5): 1089–1105. Bibcode:1967PhRv..159.1089F. doi:10.1103/physrev.159.1089.
74. ^ Jump up to:a b Alcubierre, Miguel (1994). “The warp drive: hyper-fast travel
within general relativity”. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 11 (5): L73–L77. arXiv:gr-qc/0009013. Bibcode:1994CQGra..11L..73A. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.338.8690. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001. S2CID 4797900.
75. ^ Crane, Louis; Westmoreland, Shawn (2009).
“Are Black Hole Starships Possible”. arXiv:0908.1803 [gr-qc].
76. ^ Chown, Marcus (25 November 2009). “Dark power: Grand designs for interstellar travel”. New Scientist (2736). Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2017.(subscription
77. ^ Barribeau, Tim (4 November 2009). “A Black Hole Engine That Could Power Spaceships”. io9. Archived from the original on 22 November 2015. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
78. ^ “Ideas Based On What We’d Like To Achieve: Worm Hole transportation”.
NASA Glenn Research Center. 11 March 2015. Archived from the original on 24 September 2013. Retrieved 4 September 2012.
79. ^ John G. Cramer; Robert L. Forward; Michael S. Morris; Matt Visser; Gregory Benford; Geoffrey A. Landis (15 March 1995).
“Natural Wormholes as Gravitational Lenses”. Physical Review D. 51 (3117): 3117–3120. arXiv:ph/9409051. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51.3117C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.3117. PMID 10018782. S2CID 42837620.
80. ^ Visser, M. (1995). Lorentzian Wormholes: from
Einstein to Hawking. AIP Press, Woodbury NY. ISBN 978-1-56396-394-0.
81. ^ “Icarus Interstellar – Project Hyperion”. Archived from the original on 20 April 2013. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
82. ^ Hein, Andreas; et al. (January 2012). World Ships
– Architectures & Feasibility Revisited (Report). Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2013.
83. ^ Smith, Cameron M (2014). “Estimation of a genetically viable population for multigenerational interstellar voyaging:
Review and data for project Hyperion”. Acta Astronautica. 97: 16–29. Bibcode:2014AcAau..97…16S. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.013.
84. ^ Gilster, Paul (1 April 2007). “A Note on the Enzmann Starship”. Centauri Dreams. Archived from the original
on 30 June 2011. Retrieved 18 November 2010.
85. ^ Bennett, Gary; Forward, Robert; Frisbee, Robert (10 July 1995). “Report on the NASA/JPL Workshop on advanced quantum/relativity theory propulsion”. 31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/6.1995-2599. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
86. ^ “Breakthrough Propulsion Physics” project at NASA Glenn Research Center, Nov 19, 2008
87. ^ “Warp Drive, When?”. NASA Breakthrough Technologies.
26 January 2009. Archived from the original on 7 July 2008. Retrieved 2 April 2010.
88. ^ “Sailing to the Stars: Sex and Society Aboard the First Starships”. Space.com. Archived from the original on 27 March 2009. Retrieved 3 April 2009. Malik,
Tariq, “Sex and Society Aboard the First Starships.” Science Tuesday, Space.com March 19, 2002.
89. ^ “Dr. Harold “Sonny” White – Icarus Interstellar”. icarusinterstellar.org. Archived from the original on 1 June 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
“Icarus Interstellar – A nonprofit foundation dedicated to achieving interstellar flight by 2100”. icarusinterstellar.org. Archived from the original on 2 December 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
91. ^ Moskowitz, Clara (17 September 2012). “Warp Drive
May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say”. space.com. Archived from the original on 17 August 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2012.
92. ^ Forward, R. L. (May–June 1985). “Starwisp – An ultra-light interstellar probe”. Journal of Spacecraft
and Rockets. 22 (3): 345–350. Bibcode:1985JSpRo..22..345F. doi:10.2514/3.25754.
93. ^ Benford, James; Benford, Gregory (2003). “Near-Term Beamed Sail Propulsion Missions: Cosmos-1 and Sun-Diver” (PDF). Beamed Energy Propulsion. Department of Physics,
University of California, Irvine. 664: 358. Bibcode:2003AIPC..664..358B. doi:10.1063/1.1582124. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 October 2014.
94. ^ “Breakthrough Starshot”. Breakthrough Initiatives. 12 April 2016. Archived from the original
on 12 April 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
95. ^ Starshot – Concept Archived 3 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine.
96. ^ “Breakthrough Initiatives”. breakthroughinitiatives.org. Archived from the original on 28 April 2017. Retrieved 14 April
97. ^ “Solar One – a concept for interstellar travel”. Innovation News Network. 22 May 2020. Archived from the original on 7 January 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
98. ^ Webpole Bt. “Initiative For Interstellar Studies”. i4is.org. Archived
from the original on 1 June 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2015.
99. ^ “Pioneering Interstellar Flight – Tau Zero Foundation”. Archived from the original on 19 April 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
100. ^ “Limitless Space Institute”. Archived from the
original on 7 September 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
101. ^ “Interstellar Research Group”. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 22 April 2023.
102. ^ Jump up to:a b O’Neill, Ian (19 August 2008). “Interstellar travel may
remain in science fiction”. Universe Today. Archived from the original on 26 January 2009. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
103. ^ Odenwald, Sten (2 April 2015). “Interstellar travel: Where should we go?”. Huffington Post Blog. Archived from the original
on 22 February 2017. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
104. ^ Regis, Ed (3 October 2015). “Interstellar Travel as Delusional Fantasy [Excerpt]”. Scientific American. Archived from the original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2021.
105. ^ Kulkarni,
Neeraj; Lubin, Philip; Zhang, Qicheng (2017). “Relativistic Spacecraft Propelled by Directed Energy”. The Astronomical Journal. 155 (4): 155. arXiv:1710.10732. Bibcode:2018AJ….155..155K. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaafd2. S2CID 62839612.
106. ^ Gros,
Claudius (5 September 2016). “Developing ecospheres on transiently habitable planets: the genesis project”. Astrophysics and Space Science. 361 (10): 324. arXiv:1608.06087. Bibcode:2016Ap&SS.361..324G. doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2911-0. S2CID 6106567.
Andersen, Ross (25 August 2016). “How to Jumpstart Life Elsewhere in Our Galaxy”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 18 June 2022. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
108. ^ Romero, James (13 November 2017). “Should we seed life through the cosmos
using laser-driven ships?”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 14 November 2017. Retrieved 16 November 2017.
109. ^ “Release 17-015: NASA Telescope Reveals Largest Batch of Earth-Size, Habitable-Zone Planets Around Single Star”. NASA.
22 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 March 2017. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dvanzuijlekom/15419696882/’]